I don't disagree. However, with the exception of a few abusers, I really don't think anyone mentioned here is intentionally trying to hurt anyone by questioning/challenging/debating ideas. Isn't that the privilege we have here? Or are we just supposed to blindly accept every health methodology as gospel for the sheer fact of "getting along"?

The experts Hopinso referenced have helped far more people than abused. And I never see them expecting gratitude. So what if they "bash" another protocol? They are wrong, but that doesn't mean they are abusive. Additionally, its an opportunity for those educated on the protocol to chime-in and defend it. I learn a great deal when that happens so why would I want that to go away??? Why would anyone want that to stop?

I don't mean to sound insensitive toward Hopinso. That's not my intention. I have a great deal of empathy and respect for all people involved in self-health and healing. I'm just trying to voice a different perspective and remain positive about the interactions on curezone (even the so called negative ones).