Don't know about the Pyrantel Pamoate but I can tell you the UZ zapper works, you must have more than 9 volts and a battery even when new won't work.

I won't have another QXCI/SCIO test until Feb 8th but between my last two the zapper has kept me parasite free. I do still add herbs at key times like Full and New Moons but don't seem to have any die off anymore.

But as I have stated in an earlier post, neither the Parazapper Coffee-Enema (1 week use) nor herbs or even mega CoQ10 killed of the French Hearworm I had. But I sort of knew that because only Bing Lang totally eliminated all my symptoms.

Of course knowing this now a Rife machine could have zapped it, perhaps even one of the prgrammable zappers, but the QXCI/SCIO gives you feedback so if you have access to one it may be worth the money.

About the effectiveness of the "other' herbs etc.....

Personally, I think there is so much evidence and experience in support of the effectiveness of Black-Walnut Hull and other remedies (when used properly) discussed here on this and many other sites in great detail, that it would be premature to immediately accept the first voice of dissent I have heard that claims that these remedies are only 20% effective.

While I found much in that article of great interest, and I certainly would like more information on the usefulness of Pyrantel Pamoate, I am reluctant to dismiss the other herbs and remedies on the basis of a one line statement that is neither debated nor supported.

Hello.

Re:
"
I agree that is is a dangerous assumption to presume that something good for animals is good for humans too, but in this case, pyrantel pamoate is being used for humans ( a product called combantrin ) for pinworms.
"

Actually, I'm not referring to the substance but to the formulation. The danger I mention lies in the faulty logic:

IF A is safe for MOST B, THEN it should be fine for C.

Notice the word "MOST", the construct "it should be fine" with a strong outline on the word "should", and the logical proposition that MOST B should be quite similar to C. This logic would imply great approximation between "MOST B" and C. Dangerous logic, specially in terms of health; my thought.









"
Given then that it is probably safe for humans to take (though I would n't really want to head to the local feed supplier to get my dosage as suggested in the article that started all of this!) I would like to know how effective the product is against all the parasites discussed on this forum....has anyone else had experience of using pyrantel pamoate? I 'd love to hear more...
"

There's data on Pyrantel Pamoate spread all over the place. Here's a really quick search:

"
How Well It Works

Pyrantel pamoate gets rid of pinworm infections more than 90% of the time.1 However, reinfection with pinworms is very common.
----------------------------------------------
Bundy DAP, et al. (2000). Nematodes limited to the intestinal tract (Enterobius vermicularis, Trichuris trichiura, and Capillaria philippinensis). In GT Strickland, ed., Hunter's Tropical Medicine and Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8th ed., pp. 719–721. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
"

from
http://www.svcmc.org/13451.cfm





However, I agree as well that many tests should be made to see how it kills different species EFFECTIVELY, if they're not available already; nevertheless, I'm not willing to become a test subject myself. I have little information on the substance.

I'd have to say when the discovery is first made that, "OMG, I have parasites!" Sometimes the initial reaction is panic or disgust. It is very natural to want to get rid of them quickly as possible without any forethought. In the beginning, the tendency is to read a little bit here and a little bit there, and with enthusiasm and desperation, one thinks it can be licked quickly without problems! For some people, they have a small infestation, and it turns out that they can be healed from this problem.

There are others, however, who have discovered that this isn't a simple and quick fix. Complication can arise when experimenting. Furthermore, people give up their power (without questions) in assuming that doctors or medicine is a better solution, when in fact they haven't successfully healed anyone from this problem. Over a period of time one learns to use discernment, to become wiser, be cautious, reads more, and experimentations are conversative.

In order to heal properly, one needs to know what they are dealing with first by reading as much as possible about the nature of the parasite(s). Then treat the problem with a concentrated herbal formula or a combination of drug therapy. If drugs are a choice, I'd suggest doing your due diligence before wildly jumping in, assuming that it is "the cure"; otherwise, the problem could become worse with angry parasites fighting back for their lives and your body.

Re:
"
Ahhh sometimes you gotta throw caution to the wind in order to find great results!--Within reason of course. Shroom
"


Anyone can assume risks. I take risks all the time, more than I would care to mention. However, there is a responsibility that SHOULD come with knowledge to explain to others the possibility of danger specially with regards to microscopic life forms.

If it's your own skin, nothing wrong there, but when your words imply assumptions without the responsibility of education, nobody knows how many could be harmed in their own homes attempting such assumptions by themselves from reading out a few posts.

I've heard once or twice that specially in risk, chance favors the prepared mind, but rarely the opposite. My experience is evidence of it.