As far as I can tell, ratings are no longer being given for good posts in the News forum. Is there any logical reason for this other than moderators not being on the job? I know that I have given a number of good alerts and have posted some of the best articles I have written and yet the only ratings I have seen in many weeks are ones which were posted in another forum as the primary forum.
I thought that the whole idea of the rating system, besides simply recognizing good efforts, was to call deserved extra attention to important information so that more might be able to benefit from it. To be educated instead of medicated in other words.
One unfortunate result is that in many instances no one is bothering to go to the trouble of giving a good message alert. Or a bad one either. I suppose that members must be thinking "why bother, since no one seems to be paying attention", and I can certainly understand why they would think that.
Here is an example of one downside:
One poster has spammed the news forum (and infertility forum as a cross-posted forum) no less than 5 times over the past two weeks:
http://www.curezone.com/forums/s.asp?f=762&c=0&ob=d&m=theCHR
Until I just gave bad alerts, not a single bad alert had been posted.
As a moderator of two forums myself, I am not aware of any instructions to suddenly become the Grinch when it comes to giving out good ratings or ignoring alerts. Neither are other moderators I know. In fact, one moderator contacted me and wondered why no one had given bad alerts on the messages in the above link.
So what is up?
Actually, I thought it was pretty clear that my post was talking about lack of good ratings in the News forum and used an example of unreported SPAM as an possible downside of good alerts being ignored.
Attacks, somewhat like perceived censorship, can be pretty subjective. For example, I have seen several alerts here and in the debate forums which I considered to be not worthy of an alert and more just someone not liking what was posted. In other instances, both here and in other forums, I have seen people perceive mere disagreement to be a personal attack against them and go totally berserk.
And I would remind that this forum, the same as the WM Debate forum and the Personal Conflict forums all have only one moderator. That would be THE MODERATOR. Those who disagree with that particular moderator may be in the wrong place. They are definitely barking and whining up the wrong tree.
I suppose that rating good posts is also subjective; however, a complete absence of ratings indicates to me that something is not right .
Blatant spam and advertising should be obvious to one and all.
I saw what your post was about, and replied with my own opinion. Is there a problem with that?
No problem in principle; however, it is painfully transparent that your posts and scores of others like it all relate back to your neverending crusade of bellyaching about one poster and one moderator. I strongly suggest that dragging this issue out does neither yourself nor CureZone any good. It IS the WM's website and it should be clear what he does or does not intend to do about your complaints. I get it. Almost everyone else gets it too. I wish that you too would get it and move on. You otherwise have demonstrated that you have much of value to contribute and, in my opinion, the more you continue your complaints the more you distract from your good contributions.
Perhaps what happens on this forum, is the example that the WM wishes to be seen. If that is so, then maybe all moderators should take their cue from the way this forum is moderated. That would be interesting.
The WM is very concerned about being fair to one and all and is also very strong on freedom of speech. However, I would opine that regardless of how he moderates forums he made it quite clear in his posts on the debate forums that he fully intends and supports cleaning up abuse in other forums. He also has made it abundantly clear that he supports the moderator that has a tiny handful so obsessed about, as well as other moderators who have taken action to control abuse.
Its also interesting that you use the language of "barking and whining", to describe those who express their concerns to the WM. I've noticed this before from other posters. I've also noticed this type of labelling in the wider community.
"Barking up the wrong tree" is an old and oft-used expression. Whining is, well, whining. The term is probably used frequently because that is exactly what those who use it perceive.
Oh baloney, Spuds.
Your continued posts all relate back to you and a couple of others trying to get one poster banned and then objecting when you didn't like the way one moderator chose to moderate. If that had not happened you would not continue to be posting here about the very same issues that you have thoroughly worn out regarding the one member and moderator. Whether you mention those two items specifically or just allude to them by continuing to make the same kind of complaints about censorship and moderation, it still all goes back to that and you know it as well as practically everyone else.
Now you think there is some kind of conspiracy because others speak out in support of CZ instead of the WM responding directly? The WM seldom makes direct reponses or joins in prolonged debates, but even when he does, the message apparently does not get through to some poeple. For example:
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1728281#i
So, if I ever hear one more complain against this moderator, I am personally going to block person complaining.
dbModerator has done wonderful job, and so far with very few, rather cosmetic errors, nothing of major importance!
She learned from her errors, and she is here to stay.
NO MORE PERSONAL ATTACKS!
Thumbs up for the dbModerator!
Webmaster
What exactly do you not understand about that message?
Look, I have no control over what you do or do not post. I just hate to see what you are doing to yourself and to CZ. I will remind you that when you made a farewell post and announced that you were leaving, I was among the ones who posted asking you to stay and not let anyone run you off. I also sent you private emails to the same effect. I did it not only to take up for you, but also because I thought you had valuable contributions to make to CZ. I surely did not do it for you to come back and get involved in never-ending debacles.
I'm done. No more contributing to this continuation of an issue already debated and decided. I'll leave you with a bit of appropriate exit music:
It seems to me that its ok for others to give their opinion, but when I give my opinion, that is labelled as whining. What I see, is you and others constantly whining about what I post, instead of simply not reading or responding to that which you don't like. Even to the point of ranting and personal attacks. (which sound a lot like your posts, only nastier). Very interesting, and very telling.
You are 100% correct Spud. What he has not figured out yet that his subtle attacks are still attacks and thus violate TOS.
I have seen people perceive mere disagreement to be a personal attack against them and go totally berserk.
I recall a moderator on the breast cancer support forum doing this after I simply pointed out an error in his reasoning, even though it was not an attack. He went totally berserk erasing the post then going on an attack spree while encouraging others to join in with him on the attacks. He still continues with subtle attacks and dwells on the fact that he was proven wrong by making subtle references to the thread still.
Cross posting from a private forum into a public support forum is a big no-no to me. A private forum owner, who can self-promote and advertise goods and/or services could do that and then lure all replies into their forum, to name just one way that could be abused. I won't do it. Besides, Luella rates my posts in our forum and she thinks everything I do is a bare minimum RRR.