Hello menina,
...
The amount of weight you lose at the beginning of a fast is usually commensurate with the amount and type of fat that you, or anyone else has.
In other words the heavier someone is, and the more excess weight they possess, the more weight they lose within the first few days. This also depends on whether the fat is of the loose/soft and/or flabby kind (where they lose more) compared with hardened fat deposits where less is lost.
Hi Chris :),
I am just curious, would not fat loss in a fast be dictated by the energy needs expressed by the body in the form of "basal metabolism"?... the exact amount of calories burned in fat (and lesser amounts of protein) that the body is requiring and utilizing in energy? That's what seems logical to me and anything else would seem contrary to nature.
Also, and separately, based upon what i have read, i estimate our fat to protein tissue ratio of what we burn over a long fast to be about 8:1 or 10:1. Would you agree with this and do you have any sources to support it?
Complete agreement and no questions on any of your other points, thanks!
A huge variable is not just how much fat someone has, but how much water they retain. For example, people with a high sodium diet could be retaining a tremendous amount of water, whereas people with a low sodium diet will have less retained and therefore less to lose when sodium is discontinued. Many other factors effect water retention as well. I really think that when people lose five pounds the first couple of days, one or two pounds might be fat, but the rest is water. While larger people will lose fat faster than skinnier people - they wont lose it *that* fast.
I completely agree with this and believe furthermore that in many cases, perhaps the vast majority, most of the weight we lose in a fast is temporary water loss... even in people such as myself who avoid foods with added sodium. In my 36 day fast i lost 39 pounds, but 14 days later 20 of these 39 pounds were back on my body, eating lightly. This is very much what i anticipated and in this case looked forward to with open arms, having experienced the same repeatedly over many fasts.
Eating lightly, is there even the most remote possibility that the vast majority of these 20 pounds were anything but water? I definately burned a nice amount of fat too and in proportioning my body size downward and with water making up a certain percentage of our bodies, probably a certain amount of "permanant" water loss, but i do estimate that about 20-24 pounds of the 39 was temporary water loss.
Very strangely though in the face of abundant personal evidence that has me entirely convinced in the "50% or more is temporary water loss theory" including weight logs pre, mid and post fast... documenting fast after fast after fast tons of weight that disappeared in the first 7 days with much slower losses thereforth, and extremely fast weight gain immediately upon breaking the fast (about a pound per day) with light eating, leveling off after about 2-3 weeks.
I never seem to see this distinction of water vs. fat loss made in the fasting literature but to me personally it seems more blatantly and sensationally obvious than anything else i have ever experienced : ). Does anybody by chance have any links with informative on this? :).
Would love to see Chris' perspective on this too.
While gaining 20 lbs of tissue in two weeks seems implausible, carrying around 20-24 lbs of excess water weight also seems implausible - unless one is extraordinarily obese which you clearly are not.
That's just it. I don't believe for me the 20-24 pounds of water (actually 16 pounds of it thru the first 14 days as explained below) is excess water... just "normal" water that a fasting body will deem superfluous during a fast. Gaining it back as fast as i do while avoiding any and all sodium that is not contained naturally in foods is what i base this thinking upon.
I wonder what your definition of "eating lightly" is - considering that that after an extended fast, one's metabolism will be dramatically slowed down for quiet some time. This makes it very easy to gain weight. What would count as a calorie restricted diet normally might be a binge to someone who just fasted for several weeks or more.
When i say eating lightly, i am talking about a vegetable and fruit centered diet. To be sure my metabolism slowed down in the fast, perhaps by about 1/3... perhaps going from about 2700 to about 1800, so perhaps my average metabolism over those 14 days of refeeding was 2000. To gain 20 pounds of fat in 14 days, it would have been necessary to eat about 7000 calories per day with a 90% vegetable and fruit diet when my average was much closer to 2500 :). Having been engaged in first stage resistance training from day 7, I estimate have gained about a pound of muscle and a pound of fat leaving 16 pounds of what i believe could only have been water (along with maybe 2 pounds of intestinal content). What this 16 pounds of water looks like on my body is muscles that have been filled with it, making them more pronounced while the body fat % has remained the same.