German new medicine 
charkee
16 y
18,333
R
† Cross †
I recently aided a patient with melanoma on his forehead. He is in complete remission. the course took about 6 weeks.
History: Patient worked in a coal mine for one week, he absolutely hated it and quit. He didn't like the coal dust on his forehead, it made him feel filthy. Simply speaking to him and working out his conflict with coal dust, caused a spontaneous remission. The melanoma erupted 40 years after working in the mine.
Patient #2, Lung cancer, 14 nodules in both lungs. Patient suffered a death fright for himself when diagnosed with prostrate cancer. One session speaking about his fright and using EFT. After our session the patient became ill with "bronchitis" for 5 weeks. He spent time in bed with fever and exhaustion. The MD gave him Antibiotics . X-rays show complete remission.
Many assume that Hulda Clark or Bob Beck devices cure cancer. That is not so. Most cancers are already in the healing phase. These devices help moderate the infections that occur in vagatonia or the healing phase (these infections can be fatal). These devices give hope, which is very important in the recovery process, but do not, in of themselves cure cancer.
We know what causes cancer and a device (Beck, Clark, Rife etc.) do not address the emotional issues that brought about the cancer growth.- Re: German new medicine Desperadonyc5
16 y
16,360
More
- Re: German new medicine charkee
16 y
16,255
This is a reply to # 1,305,662EFT= Energy Freedom Techniques. Developed by Gary Craig.
http://www.emofree.com/
- EFT = Emotional Freedom Technique - ... Dquixote1217
16 y
16,955
J.Crow’s® Lugol’s Iodine
Free S&H.Restore lost reserves.J.CROW’S®Lugol’s Iodine Solut...
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Free Shipping on order over $29
Bio Cleanse Detox Kit
”I have recommended it to family and friends already and am sure...
This is a reply to # 1,312,909Actually, EFT more commonly refers to Emotional Freedom Technique.
You can download a free manual by clicking here:
http://www.tbyil.com/EFTmanual.pdf
Once opened, just save the file.
DQ
- EFT = Emotional Freedom Technique - ... Dquixote1217
16 y
16,955
- Re: German new medicine charkee
16 y
16,255
- My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
17,018
RR
This is a reply to # 1,304,889
My two cents:
I think that the physical toll from long term mental distress could provide an invitation for cancer - but in no way will I ever believe that trauma and stress alone cause cancer.
Neither do I agree that we know the cause of cancer unless you wish to determine cancer as a cellular defense mechanism brought on by irritation/inflammation due to a number of items such as chemical contamination, bacteria, virus, heavy metals, etc.
Most people who have been diagnosed with cancer are not in the healing phase in my opinion - their cancer cells and tumors are continuing to multiply and halting the growth of the actual cancer cells AND the eliminating the root causes that led to cancer manifesting itself are both vital for survival.
Eliminating stress and addressing mental conflicts can be important measures to help achieve success, and failure to do so could make success much more difficult. Like Essiac tea or a juice diet, such measures just might result in the elimination of the cancer, but I would not bet my life on it because in most instances much more is needed.
To be succint, I think that "stress (or trauma) causes cancer" is in the same category as "cancer is a fungus", "cancer is caused by a fluke", "cancer is caused by myco-toxins", and any other number of universal causes, or universal cures for that matter. It sounds good and sells lots of books and products, but it is not valid when presented as a universal cause.
DQ
- Re: My two cents charkee
16 y
16,192
This is a reply to # 1,305,743Research into the causes of cancer has had little progress in over a century. Yes, we know all the little chemical, hormonal etc. ins and outs. Yet many of the causes still elude us. Nevertheless Dr. Hamer has indeed found the cause. If it were not so then I would not be successful at helping cancer patients cure themselves. Cervical, colon cancers are usually in the healing stage that is they are already in the process of breaking down. Micro-organisms aid in the break down process. This is where medical care is important as the infections can be fatal. Cervical cancer is usually cased by a lose of a lover. Colon cancer is usually caused by an inability to forgive or let go of something dirty or disgusting. These two cancers are usually found in the healing stage. So the Dr. gives chemo or radiation or whatever and the patient is "cured". However, should the patient still be in the conflict active stage the cancer will continue to grow with 100% fatality. (depending on the embryonic tissue from which the cancer originates)
What you think is very wrong, I have seen cases go into remission simply by resolving the conflict, the trauma shock. No needles, drugs, radiation, herbs etc. In the healing phase the patient us usually ill, very tired, with fevers, but has a good appetite. The body requires rest and a high protein diet.
All these different protocols ( and the list keeps growing) don't really help, except for the moral support they may give. If the trauma or conflict are not solved, not even chemo, or surgery will work.- Re: My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
16,226
This is a reply to # 1,312,904
Dr. Hamer has indeed found the cause.
So he claims. And so do any number of other people who have books, programs and products to promote that THEY have found a unique cause, feature or cure of cancer.
What Hamer has discovered is an important element of treating and resolving cancer. To try to put forward the idea that it is the ONLY cause of cancer is the stuff of an over active imagination or marketing.
Why is it that only in modern times has cancer become so prevalent? Clearly, mankind has had trauma and stress for thousands of years, including no end of loss of lovers and inability to let go of emotional issues - but yet mankind has had very little cancer until the past century or and the incidence has steadily increased until just the past few years. What mankind has not had in the past thousands of years prior to the 19th century is an abundance of well over 100,000 man made chemicals in our air, soil, water and food supply until modern times.
I have no doubts at all that resolving emotional issues may often help resolve cancer. But to put such forward as the ONLY cause or cure of cancer falls within the same realm as those who say that ionic foot baths, rare earth magnets or reflexology will cure all ills.
What I advocate is directly attacking the cancer while also addressing and correcting underlying problems and imbalances - and that includes emotional stress as well as cleansing, diet, lifestyle, proper nutrition and supplementation, etc. To not address all of those areas would be remiss.
DQ
- Re: My two cents Hveragerthi
16 y
16,605
This is a reply to # 1,312,904Actually we have learned a lot about the causes of cancer over the last century. We now know that the vast majority of cancers are caused by viruses. Some are bacterial, some are fungal. A few VERY rare cancers are caused from parasites. Then there are radiation induced cancers such as thyroid cancer from radioactive Iodine released from nuclear power plants (see the US human guinea pig studies around the Hanford nuclear power plant where they deliberately released radioactive Iodine on the surrounding population), and lung cancer from radon gas.
Here are some examples:
Human papilloma virus (HPV) linked to cervical, breast, prostate, nasopharyngeal, and skin cancers.
Epstein Barre Virus (EBV) linked to B cell lymphoma.
Then there are the human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma viruses 1, 2, 3 and 4, which causes various leukemias and lymphomas.
Simian virus type 40 that contaminated the polio vaccines given to 90 million Americans has been linked to brain, liver, and bone cancers.
Kaposi's sarcoma has both a viral form and a bacterial form.
Helicobacter pylori bacteria is linked to stomach cancer.
Aspergillus niger fungus produces aflatoxins linked to liver cancer.
These are just a few examples. Cancers are not caused from suppressed emotions. As an example look at David the "Bubble Boy". Do you know what he died from? B cell lymphoma. Where did it come from? When they gave him a bone marrow transplant from his sister her bone marrow was not screened for Epstein Barre Virus. With no immune system the virus immediately caused B cell lymphoma, which killed him.
As more evidence I have seen herbs and other alternative therapies work numerous times for various cancers. None of these therapies change suppressed emotions, but they still get rid of the cancers.
- Re: My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
16,194
This is a reply to # 1,313,356
I certainly agree with you that cancer is not caused by emotions, though I think that emotional issues can contribute to one's susceptibility to cancer as well as retard recovery.
I am not so sure about viruses being the cause of the "vast majority of cancers", unless the viruses are either new ones or else they cause cancer in combination with other factors. If viruses alone are the cause, wouldn't that mean that the viruses that cause cancer are pretty much a modern development since the proliferation of cancer is very much a modern phenomena?
Obviously diet, nutrition and lifestyles which lead to impaired immune systems and impaired livers are factors. What role do you see the increased exposure to manmade toxins playing? Incidence of cancer and other diseases and industrialization/chemical exposure closely parallel.
DQ
- Re: My two cents Hveragerthi
16 y
16,126
This is a reply to # 1,313,361Emotions do play a role as far as immune suppression from stress. Just like people prone to herpes outbreaks will get the outbreaks most often when they are stressed out, which weakens the immune system though adrenal dysfunction and elevated cortisol, which atrophies the thymus.
As for cancer though, this is not a modern phenomena. Cancer has been around for a long time. The first cancer virus was identified in 1910, and cancer was around long before that.
- Re: My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
15,966
MoreThis is a reply to # 1,313,379
Yes, cancer has been around a very long time. For example, the first known use of oleander to treat cancer was by the Egyptians in the 8th century BC. I do not disagree that viruses are a prime cause of cancer, but no matter how long cancer has been around, the proliferation of cancer has occured in modern terms and has paralled industrialization and the creation of man made chemicals used in industrial and other processes, as well as pesticides and herbicides and other household chemicals and products - a very great many of which have been identified as carcinogens because they are cancer causing agents even though only a tiny fraction have been studied or tested. Thus my ealier questions about whether cancer causing viruses themselves were modern in their genesis and the role you believe that toxins play.
I personally believe that manmade toxins play a huge role in causing inflammation/irritation which ultimately leads to a cellular defense mechanism that causes cancer. Do you think that perhaps there is a link between toxins and viruses with toxins being part of a process that enables the cancer causing viruses to more easily do their dirty work?
DQ
- Re: My two cents charkee
16 y
16,058
This is a reply to # 1,313,402Virus doesn't cause cancer. Virus, fungus, bacteria are present in the healing stage of cancer, they aid in the break down phase. Though this stage can be dangerous, this is when medical care is needed to make sure the infections or other complications don't get out of hand.
Emotional issues are the main cause of cancer, otherwise I, an amateur would not be curing cancer at a much higher rate than that of the medical establishment. So far I'm at 100%. Dr. Hamer is at 92% and he has done thousands of cases. Can you do so well with chemo, vitamins, radiation or surgery? My teachers and classmates are up at 95%.
So could we say that environment could cause cancer in 5% of the cases? Or should we say that 5% just can't, no matter what, forgive? There are many assumptions in the medical field that hinder effective treatment and discovery.
One is the we are a product of our environment. That is not completely true, we are also a product of our ancestors. This is why we can cure autism, Asperger's, and Tourlets syndrome. (one of my classmates, an M.D. has gotten quite good at curing autism.)
Another is that life's events are random, (including parasites and toxins) they are not, everything has meaning. This latter issue is a major hurtle to those that have been trained in Aristotelian logic. Trained to think within the box thinkers. Our minds are vastly more powerful than we give them credit.
Another is that we are nothing but a walking creature of chemicals. This is totally false and anyone that has had an OBE or NDE can attest to this.
This is why Dr. Hamer and Dr. Sabbah's works are totally rejected by the medical establishment, it steps out of the box. Saying that micro-organisms cause disease is like saying broken bones cause fractures. Hen or the egg, which is first? Which is first, virus or cancer? Sore throat or strep? Strep is there, so therefore it must be the cause? Socrates was much more intelligent than Aristotle or as I believe Aristotle purposely mislead the people accepting pay-offs from the sorcerer.
- Re: My two cents Hveragerthi
16 y
16,433
This is a reply to # 1,313,566>Virus doesn't cause cancer. Virus, fungus, bacteria are present in the healing >stage of cancer, they aid in the break down phase.
This is not true. Microbes causing cancer have been demonstrated so many times that there is no doubt that they are a cause. Have you ever looked in to Dr. Virginia Livingston Wheeler's research with cancer microbes? Her research proves a viral origin to many cancers.
And when chickens get an outbreak of cancer from the Rous sarcoma virus are all the chickens suppressing emotions from the trauma of their birth? Maybe they are stressed out that they are going to end up on the dinner table so they are subconsciously committing suicide to avoid becoming big enough to be someone's dinner.
And are you aware that cancer also forms in plants? Are they suppressing emotions as well, or is it the viruses infecting them causing their cancers?
And how do herbs, ozone, or radiofrequency therapy kill cancer when none of these do anything for suppressed emotions, but they do kill cancer microbes? Chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the other hand fail the majority of the time because they do not address the cancer microbes. They just kill the cells leaving the microbe to replicate and regrow the cancer in a few years.
The fact remains that the majority of cancers are caused from viruses. These viruses insert themselves in the genes of a host altering the way those cells behave. If you need more evidence look in to the genetic differences between normal cancer cells and chemo or radiation resistant cancer cells from the same exact tissues. You will see that cancer viruses in fact do play a role in the formation of the original cancer mass as well as allowing some cancers to survive chemotherapy and radiation.
- Re: My two cents patientadvocate
16 y
16,102
This is a reply to # 1,314,013it's been proven.
"infections that do not heal can cause cancer."
anybody ever hear of papilloma, 99% chance it causes cervical cancer.
nobel prize awarded to doctor who created cancer out of fungal infection.
chronic prostate infections have higher rates of turning cancerous.
chronic infectious colitis very high risk for colon cancer!
no controversy here!!!
toxins can cause cancer tool. thrashing immune system, carcinogens that absorb or attach to cells.
sorry for the caps.
- Re: My two cents piniKr
8 y
4,615
This is a reply to # 1,314,013In a dysplastic field with high virus load (lytic cycles >> lysogenic cycles), where stem cells are also destructed (aplasia), tumor protects stem cell destruction. Actually there is some cross talk between hit stem cells to normal stem cell instructing them to transform (bystander effect).
Should virus load medically / dietetic-ally decline, tumor may become dormant or shrink (meditation). Medically like for instance as Dr Coley did with Coley's toxins or in the future when virus interfere will be allowed (
presently prohibited by dogma). Virus interfere: please see presentation from Professor Zajicek on you-tube (and have a good idea for startup): "How to cure chronic Hepatitis, In 1911 Francis Peyton Rous discovered the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) which causes a chicken sarcoma. In 1960 Harry Rubin discovered a virus which prevents RSV from causing a chicken sarcoma, ..."- Re: My two cents piniKr
5 y
2,375
This is a reply to # 2,301,916Cancer is a viral disease. Virus destroys mainly end cells (matured cells in Q
compartment), to which the organism responds with chronic inflammation and
increased proliferation to restore the organ and clean the debris. In this
chronic inflammation tumor may emerge. When stem cells are hit, the entire
Tissue Proliferation Unit disappears, to which the organism responds with
dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, carcinoma, etc... According to the hypothesis of
professor Zajicek MD, tumor protects against cachexia (muscle loss, wasting
manifested as fatigue and weight loss). Every cure, which silences the disease
driver, namely virus, cures cancer. Muscle loss is seen in all cancer types.
Cancer is one disease. Example: Fever is a defensive mechanism. Plus two
degrees protects while plus five kills. As long as tumor does not block any
vital function or causes pain, it should be left untreated. Patient should keep
her tumor as much as possible. Some people find alternative treatments, like
Ann Vigmor diet, very helpful. With a treatment strategy of tumor dormancy and
with host resistance to virus , only minimal doses of medication may be
required. Tumor dormancy is a state:when tumor shrinks or stop growing. In any
case patient feels healthy.- Re: My two cents joegrane
5 y
2,647
This is a reply to # 2,426,308The real connection between cancer and viruses may be nagalese. Check out Dr Tim Smith on the subject
https://immuneactivator.wordpress.com/2015/11/03/nagalase/
Cancer may be the response of stem cells to a sick environment, one with low voltage on the nearby acupuncture meridian and therefore low oxygen. For more on this check out Dr Nick Gonzalez, Dr Jerry Tennant and Prof. T. Seyfreid.
Tennant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcO6GiVPCSk&fbclid=IwAR0kQ_ylJKmZSWUJjKnyoRVlNaceTRf5FUArwY7tbD51BIkmEo8QfH4iJQ0
Gonzalez, Kelly, Beard tradition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVc8xwr_wfc&t=3515s
Seyfreid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEE-oU8_NSU
- Re: My two cents trapper/kcmo
5 y
2,536
- Re: My two cents trapper/kcmo
5 y
2,536
- Re: My two cents joegrane
5 y
2,647
- Re: My two cents piniKr
5 y
2,375
- Re: My two cents patientadvocate
16 y
16,102
- Re: My two cents Hveragerthi
16 y
15,961
This is a reply to # 1,313,566>Which is first, virus or cancer?
The virus. Take for example hepatitis patients. Many are diagnosed with viral hepatitis long before they develop liver cancer.
When these cancer viruses are injected in to animals they routinely develop the same cancers. So are trying to claim that all of these animals are sharing the same suppressed emotions? - [Message Subject Hidden by a Forum Moderator] hopnat
9 y
5,121
- Re: My two cents Hveragerthi
16 y
16,433
Expand 19 messages, 21 to 39 of 39 Hveragerthi
16 y
15,869
- Re: My two cents charkee
16 y
16,058
- Re: My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
15,966
- Re: My two cents Hveragerthi
16 y
16,126
- Re: My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
16,194
- Re: My two cents Dquixote1217
16 y
16,226
- Re: My two cents charkee
16 y
16,192
- Re: German new medicine Desperadonyc5
16 y
16,360
