|
A Primary Obligation Regarding "Law" Is: Question Authority!
Dr. Ed Rivera Explains Your Duty to Question Authority - ALWAYS!
Date: 1/11/2016 6:14:58 PM ( 8 y ) ... viewed 1782 times January 30, 2021 - Now - To Preserve the Natural and Unalienable Rights of All Mankind![12]*
-
***
June 18, 2020 - The "Challenge (of) All Authority in Search of The Truth" Now Needs to be Applied to Medical Authority! -
The same principal that Ed Rivera has presented (referred to in the following post) in regards to governmental assertions of jurisdiction is also pertinent to the current plan-demic crisis. This Blog-writer is confident that challenging medical authority in search of the truth will reveal a completely foreign power that includes anti-American elements. The indications of this is already apparent with every restriction now laid upon the unalienable Rights of every American (as expressed in the first Organic Law for The United States of America).
-
***
April 23, 2019 - "What freedom means from the eyes of a Native Indian and how our tax system was originally designed to support that type of freedom."
"...Both public and private education has many aspects of brainwashing and is just a waste of time and money. The most valuable education is the one that teaches the student to challenge all authority in search of the truth. This is the only method that I know of to discover truth."[11]
-
***
January 11, 2016 - The spirit of this is the "Spirit of 1776"![1]
The American people are very well conditioned to follow orders - whether it is under the "Color of Law" or under virtually any other form of authority. Not a really great idea when it comes to limiting (let alone violently violating) American freedoms that were hard won over two hundred and thirty-two years ago.[2]
-
***
October 7, 2018 - "You Are Not a Slave of The STATE (a State, any "state", etc.)" -
Government workers presume you are a subject of the Almighty STATE and that you have a duty to respect them as your superior and obey their codes. But, you are not a slave of the STATE. Slavery was outlawed by the 13th Amendment. You have an unalienable, God-given right, even a duty, to your life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government (presumption), and to provide new Guards for their future security” - [Declaration of Independence][10]
-
***
January 13th -
I think the following letter from Thomas Jefferson belongs here.
"I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. ... It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: and very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a Chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: and what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent and persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it's motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion.
The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13 states independant 11 years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted." - Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Paris, 13 Nov. 1787.
-
***
January 14th, 2016 -
"...a hierarchy is designed to avoid, eliminate or destroy corrective feedback."[6]
We're talking societal systems. Now apply that to the events of September 11, 2001. Those events were only made possible because of the hierarchy that was in place at that time. Without the hierarchy 9/11 would not have been possible.
Hierarchy has a history that goes back to long before the founding of The United States of America. Although the Declaration of Independence (as the first Organic Law in America) ended the external/foreign government it didn't end hierarchy. The Articles of Confederation (1777) as the second Organic Law acknowledged the freedom of the individual to not have to volunteer into the hierarchy. That freedom remained intact for several years. Later the new external/foreign hierarchy began with the first President of the USA/US: General George Washington!
-
***
January 17, 2016 -
A basic knowledge of the Organic Laws is essential "To Question Authority" and especially for preserving/asserting your own freedom from re - actions "under color of law". If you become a student of the Organic Laws then always do your best to be clear about what you study. Get Organic Law references from your teacher.
I just submitted the following at the Adventures in Sovereignty site.:
Greetings all!
I have a couple questions in reading Judge Anna's "How to restore the land jurisdiction step-by-step".
Re: "You are intent on restructuring things in a lawful and orderly fashion and are merely exercising responsibilities and property rights you inherited."
Are these "property rights" in regards to public lands or the like?
Re: #3. "Explain that there has been a lot of legal chicanery involved and that it is necessary as a result for people to reclaim their rightful and correct birthright political status as one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States ..."
Especially re: "... people of the United States."
Isn't "the United States" the property owned by The United States of America? If so why would we want to claim "political status" there?
Re: "As that number of people grows, the caseload will grow, but so will the number of people employed."
What people are "employed", who or what employs them and how are these "employees" compensated?
Re: "Since 1965 there have been fewer and fewer Americans exercising their natural birthright political status so that many people are not aware that there is any difference between a 'US citizen' and 'one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States'."
Where in the Organic Law can we find: 'one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States'?
Thank You!
-
***
August 7, 2018 -
"... There should be no political parties running our country and we shouldn't be participating in these foreign corporation elections -- unless we really are Territorial 'citizens'.
There should be no Republicans and no Democrats --- no billions of dollars spent on popularity contests and snarky commentators, glitter and confetti and balloons and lobbyists. We've accepted it like everything else, on faith, without comment, because that's the way it was when we arrived on the scene and it never occurred to us to question it."[9]
-
***
Jan. 27th -
In questioning "State" authority.
Three possible questions:
Governor of what? What does "State of ________" mean? Does the authority of Governor ________ extend to other than "...in this State"?
-
***
August 30, 2019 - More Possibilities for Questioning Authority -
One of the very first questions that an natural born American could consider when approached by a governmental agent is to ask them: "Are you a public servant?" If they answer "Yes" then inform them that you are their Lawful "employer" via the original service contract known as the Constitution of September 17, 1787. If they answer "No" then you can explicitly decline their commercial "offer" and be on your merry way. If they don't answer your question or say anything other than "Yes/No" (whereby they essentially avoid answering you) then you can express your demand to know who they are and in what capacity they are acting in as well as what their Lawful authority is to confront you.
-
***
March 17, 2018 - Re: The Purported "Authority" of DHS, ICE, et al. -
The "Powers" delegated to Congress by the Constitution for the United States of America (the Preamble 'title' at end of first paragraph) at Article I., Section 8.
The "authority" of Congress is by way of the said Constitution, but that is LIMITED by Article IV., Section 3., Clause 2., and is not applicable to these United States of America, but only to a federal territory, possession, or commonwealth; not a State of the Union.
"The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States;".
The statutory equivalent of Article IV., Section 3., Clause 2., is this congressional text: "Act of Congress" includes [4] any act of Congress locally applicable to and in force in the District of Columbia, in Puerto Rico, in a territory or in an insular possession.
The legal definition above was published in U.S. Codes, TITLE 18, APPENDIX-RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE / Rule 54. Application and Exception / (c) APPLICATION OF TERMS. In December 2000, it was removed.
The deletion of the definition of an "Act of Congress" by the Government Printing Office eight months and 11+ days prior to "9-11", made it all the more likely that the later-created DHS / ICE would not be challenged, when not at their lawful territorial venue(s).[8]
***********^***********
Footnotes:
[i] This sentence has possibly been misquoted as "every generation needs a new revolution."
[ii] PTJ 12:356-7. Letterpress copy at the Library of Congress. A transcription of this letter from Ford is available online as well.
Re: [i] Good thing I found this with my search terms: "revolution every 20 years" for as you can see I had what appears to be a "misquoted" impression.
"A revolution is usually organized by the leading class who wants to change the political regime and social structure. It breaks out as a response to the aggressive and oppressive actions of the government; it involves great masses of people who have one common idea and a leader or leaders who proclaim this idea. The result of any revolution is usually complete or partial victory because this word itself presumes a change in the regime. A rebellion is more chaotic, the masses are not organized. People, as well as during revolution, usually rebel against infringement of their interests but their forces are not always aimed to change the political or social structure. The result of any rebellion is usually defeat."[3]
However, if Jefferson were to agree with the most previous quoted presentation then I think his use of the term "rebellion" would be more like the meaning of "revolution".
More regarding "how rebellion differs from revolution".
"This essay demonstrates how, in certain social circumstances, the casual association of youth in front of a church could be considered rebellious, and why, in this historical context, a government would regard nuns, priests, catechists, health workers and literacy teachers as subversives.
The pastoral work that is taking place throughout El Salvador and in other parts of Central and South America would have been a great challenge to Albert Camus. I suggest that if Camus were alive today, and had the opportunity to meet Juanita Martinez and her co-workers, he would have revised some of the conclusions that he reached in his work The Rebel. This essay is an attempt to introduce Camus to Juanita and other members of her pastoral team and to the rebellion to which they have devoted their lives. It is about rebellion and how rebellion differs from revolution. It is about how change occurs in the context where violent repression has been cloaked in the mantle of innocence and legitimacy."[4]
rebellion (n.) Look up rebellion at Dictionary.com
"war waged against a government by some portion of its subjects," mid-14c., from Old French rebellion (14c.) and directly from Latin rebellionem (nominative rebellio) "rebellion, revolt; renewal of war," from rebellis[5]
***********^***********
Notes:
[1]
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lawmen/8U6Qzq_WVi4
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_%281783%29
[3] http://hotessays.blogspot.com/2012/09/rebellion-vs-revolution-essay.html
[4] http://www.crvp.org/book/Series07/VII-18/chapter-11.htm
[5] http://etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=rebellion
[6] http://www.titanians.org/holomats-octologues/
[8] All of this entry from a private email that originated from a researcher specializing in Law analysis.
[9] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/08/who-started-rot.html
[10] "Proof of Claim: Your Main Defense Against Government Greed and Corruption"; Page 12 of 27-
Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry,
http://sedm.org Form 09.073, Rev. 9-23-2018:
https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/ProofOfClaim.pdf
[11] https://famguardian.org/PublishedAuthors/Govt/TaxHonestyPersecution/Rivera/DrRiveraLesson1And2.pdf
[12] http://www.paulstramer.net/2021/01/all-hands-on-deck.html
--
***********^***********
Keywords:
Ed Rivera, Duty, Question Authority, rebellion, revolution, hierarchy, judge anna, land jurisdiction, Governor, State of, in this State
-
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
