Where does it say that the state owns your body? Or your child? Despite the FDA and other government entities assuming powers they do not constitutionally have, our country was founded on the principals that the we as individuals have the supreme power and that the local, state and federal governments have only the powers that we the people grant them. In all too many instances, that has meant that government has assumed any and all powers that citizens do not rise up and protest against.
Given the government's record of siding with the monied interests in our foods, our medicines and industrial polluters why should they be trusted to determine what is best for someone's child? If things were the way they should be, and our heath and welfare took precedent over profits, then natural health, actual cures and prevention would be the treatments of choice and dangerous drugs and managed illness would be the outsiders.
If such were the case, and we had not been brainwashed with over a century of lies about the real truth of nature versus man-made medicines, I wonder what the out cry would be if the government attempted to take someone off of natural treatment and force them into chemo, which has an overall cure rate of 3% when you get past the lies and statistical manipulations? (http://www.cancertruth.net/?gclid=CL7Qwp-cyI0CFRGsGgodNw-VLg) I daresay there would be a lynching!
That is exactly what the government IS doing, and perhaps there should be some lynchings!
"No medical doctor (who uses chemotherapy, radiation, and/or surgery) has ever administered a synthetic drug or done a medical procedure that stopped the spread of cancer. That is not what they do. What they do is slow down the cancer, in some cases. You might ask: do they really wantto stop the spread of cancer and cure the patient? While individual doctors may want tocure their cancer patients, as far as an industry is concerned, the evidence is overwhelming that the answer to that question is ‘no’"
- Webster Kehr
The Cancer Tutor