Re: Another Round

Thanks for posting it, V. Someone give him a big RN. Great article. This was interesting:

>>It is noteworthy that both CRN and NPA have posted on their websites information stating that S.1082 is not a threat to dietary supplements. Both organizations are flat out wrong. They cite a colloquy by Hatch, Harkin, Kennedy, and Enzi as their evidence. This colloquy was a direct result of our grassroots campaign to alert the American consumer to this major threat. In no way does this colloquy protect dietary supplements. UNTIL THE LANGUAGE IN THE BILL IS CHANGED THE THREAT EXISTS AND IS VERY REAL.<<

Did you see this, from May:

The colloquy:


http://www.wellnessresources.com/newsroom/index.php/content/articles/s1082_th...
Tweet