IDs star witness Behe admitted that for ID to be considered as science, the definition would have to be stretched so much it would also include other pseudosciences like astrology, alchemy, phrenology, palmistry, and more.
Hi Corinthian,
Why do you have that figure on your profile? I had the impression you are a guy. Anyway, I can understand this because we don't scientifically know the intentions of an intelligent designer. However, we don't have to guess what his intentions are. I think all we have to do is look for the results and sort of reverse engineer them.
(3) ID’s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community”.
Why does inquiry have do be desribed as negative? I would expect evolutionists to attempt to refute them. This to me is the same reason why we have debate forums here on curezone although the debate threads don't ususally work that way.