Re: EPFX/SCIO a little shaky on parasite identification?
Hi Cora,
How much faith do you put into the SCIO, after your initial encounter with the device and practitioner? How much do you now you understand, how much do you think you understand, what do you not know (in comparison with what you think you know), and how much of what do you question viability?
I think I have faith in the SCIO, in general, but it is probably not as useful or as practical for
parasites as I would like it to be. It was dead on in detecting every health problem I have. Considering Newport's response below on this string, it doesn't seem pracitcal, considering the cost per session, to use this for
parasite removal. My practitioner is very new with the SCIO and that doesn't help. I had to guide her regarding
parasites using info from some of Newport's previous postings. So, I don't have very much confidence in her. Maybe if you would just like a general tune-up the SCIO would be nice. She ran the "balancing Chakra' program on me, and I must say I haven't felt this calm and centered in years.
I'm sure I don't know as much about the machine as I would like. I understand the underlying physics, but I was not aware that it was checking reactivity until I read Newport's post. It makes sense that if my immune system is ignoring Lung Flukes because, perhaps in the past, it killed one and didn't like the toxins, bacteria, candida, etc...that came out when it died, then how would the SCIO know? So then, what good is the SCIO as a diagnostic and treatment tool? Considering the expense, what good is it for
parasite removal?
Thanks for the reply
Bugboy