Chemo Is Worse Than Ineffective (Cancer Forum) 4/12/2007 845130

Chemo Is Worse Than Ineffective

Clarkia Extra Strong
Clarkia Tincture 2 oz, 4 oz, 8 oz, and 16 oz

Tony Isaacs Views: 1,810
Published: 18 y

This is a reply to # 841,842

Chemo Is Worse Than Ineffective

The survival rate of those who had cancer and used chemo goes down after 18 months, whereas the survival rate of those who had cancer and did not use chemo goes up after 18 months. What does that tell you?

All of my messges on this board All of my messges anywhere

Add To Favorites!

Like Dislike

Alert Moderators

DISCLAIMER

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!

Expand this whole thread (3 messages)

Reuters Health Says Chemo Is Ineffective Dorothy and Toto 18 y 2,140 † C †
- Apparently , this study only spanned five years. T... chris10 18 y 1,444
  - Chemo Is Worse Than Ineffective Tony Isaacs 18 y 1,810
    This is the position of the above message within the thread.

Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

0.233 sec, (1)

Chemo Is Worse Than Ineffective

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!

This is the position of the above message within the thread.