I agree that a response is called for, and cannot disagree about a call to action. What I disagree with is the facts of the matter being presented in a misleading way.
I think my amended post with the blog from Jon Barron puts it in a better perspective. That is real information. The original call for action message is disinformation because it presents the false information that in less than three weeks we will suddenly lose all access to alternative therapies and natural supplements.
Even so, the re-interpretation of DSHEA guidlines is an important issue.
I think we are on the same side. We are definitely in the same state (Texas) : )
"Better to hunt in fields for health unbought, Than fee the doctor for a nauseous draught. The wise for cure on exercise depend; God never made his work for man to mend."
- John Dryden