Re: Anti-Quackwatch "Defamation" Litigation ROARS Forward...

Bring it on, tough guy.

Do you ever use the material you offer?

Are you a chemist? A physicist? A doctor? A nutritionist? A nurse? A research biochemist? A DNA researcher?

If not -- well, then, chances are, we're not all that different in this regard. I don't live this stuff (either?).

Call me on logical fallacies any time, anywhere. I'll accept any help honing my skills that you can offer. You have yet to answer for any of yours. It's amusing (in a haughty, holier-than-thou kinda way) how you accuse Bolen of lacking reasoning skills for having an opinion which differs from yours, yet you repeatedly invoke logical fallacies and expect me to accept these as evidence of your reasoning superiority? Ha!

"...there is nothing special about QW trying to silence critics and that it is common place with organizations, religions, companies and individuals be the on the alternative or mainstream side" is such a cop out. You critically used Scientology as an example precisely because it tries to silence critics, and now you're defending the same action by QuackWatch because "everybody does it".

Are you real?

Bolen defends free speech. QuackWatch attacks it. There is no better character determinant than where one stands on that issue. Side with rights trashers at your own peril.