Re: Anti-Quackwatch "Defamation" Litigation ROARS Forward...

No, John of course not.  However if he throws his hat behind Clark, it suggest a serious deficit in his ability to recognize outright quackery from unproven but potentially beneficial protocols.  Had they essay stuck to the issue of free speech, it would have my full support. 

I had previously expressed my opposition to anyone trying to squash free speech, including Quackwatch.   I would even support the right of the hatemongering Nazi #5XXXXX if some one tried to suppress his hate speech.