So you assertion that only a quackbuster is capable of such action is nothing but lies. Don't be a liar John
Man, did you ever misrepresent what I said. This is what I said:
Why are the Quackbusters engaged in attacking free speech?
What kind of person does that?
Being that kind of person is a requirement for being a Quackbuster.
For you to completely revise the meaning of what I said ("in order to be a Quackbuster, you have to be the kind of person who is against freedom of speech") into what you seem to think I said ("only a Quackbuster is against freedom of speech") is so intellectually dishonest that you should be ashamed of yourself.