Re: Wikipeda key words

Dear Telman,

thanks for your reply. I was hoping that you would show up upon my post.

However, I am not sure whether we are talking about the same article and the same source respectively. Wikepeda says very clearly a New Zealand hospital has analysed the stones that turned out to be NO REAL GALL STONES. Despite this - again Wikepeda - "there are some people that experience benefit from liver flushing".

Furthermore, in front of my nose there is a very short note of The Lancet: Title: Apple juice and the chemical-contact softening of Gallstones - written by Dekkers R (a Dutsch person). He got his wife's stones analysed and - I cite "At the university they were recognized as fatty stones (whatever this "fatty" means, the author is not an English native speaker).

Furthermore: You were so nice to put the copy of the Massachusets lab into your post. As to my knowledge this is THE ONLY document I have ever seen here in curezone. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I would love to hearing more people presenting me the scientific lb proof that the stones expelled via flushing are REAL gall stones.

Now you could argue: "Why don't you get you stones analyzed"?
However, "unfortunately" I am stone free - a postive fact in itself but not for my present question.

Thanks a lot dear Telman and blessings
Tweet