It's an example(s) of illogical thinking

I hope your kidding. It sounds like someone tore an article out of a paper, handed it to you and you typed it on the net.

Did you read it??

It is full of fallacies. They tell me, fallacies are arguments that may sound logical, but are not. I'm not disputing the numbers you present as empirical evidence (although you did not provide info as to how the data was analyzed). But I have read from other sources other than yours that the Black or Negro population is declining while the Hispanic population is increasing (especially with illegal immigration). So I can see how abortion would be a contributor to this decline.

However you have a FALSE CAUSE. You have called in genocide as the cause. You picked this out of thin air. There isn't any argument to show that is the cause.

Of course abortion will bring the population numbers down. But that's a correlation. What is causing the abortion? You did not answer that. Wake up. A correlation cannot point to a cause of something. It requires more work to get at the cause of this complex question.

Try to understand this abstract example:
If A is correlated with B, A could be the cause of B.
If A is correlated with B, B could be the cause of A.
Something else is the cause of BOTH A AND B. (most likely)

I have to laugh at this one ..Klu KLux Klan supporting abortion...unless you would provide a reference for it. I'd be interested in reading it. I find it funny because you are trying to say certain things are similar in some way without saying specifically how. It goes something like this:

The KKK is a bad organization.
Abortion is bad.
So somehow abortion is bad and made worse than bad because the KKK supports it.

More of the same:
"You can't trust Sherlock Holmes--he used cocaine!"
"You can't trust Adler--he was a socialist!"
"You can't trust person X--after all he was a Marxist!"
But drug addicts, cocaine users, socialists and KKK members can be RIGHT! (Ha,ha).... even anti-abortion (pro-life) people can be right.

You don't appear to understand what the components of something are and how they relate to the whole if you are a believer in your article. Much like the logical fallacy the anti-abortion (pro-life) group makes when relating an embryo to a person.

You used the back door of someone's color to attack Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger.

You could use your article as an exercise in logic, incorporated this post, find other fallacies and share your find here.