Re: LIE!-The vtool barcode conspiracy flops

WRONG - http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Whalen/0512/20051221_Wed_FrankWhalen3.mp3
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Whalen/0512/20051221_Wed_FrankWhalen4.mp3
That person interviewed in the broadcast is an expert on this matter of 6 6 6, having spoken with IBM - etc. I have spoken to Dr. Stan Deyo, former Special Agent with the F.B.I. who is a software programming expert at that time, and has SEEN it, as well as Dr. John Coleman, former British M16 intelligent analyst and advisor to the Queen of England who has also seen it and the BEAST computers, and written of the 6 6 6 issue in some of his monographs. Also Ralph Nader is quoted as having seen these 6 6 6 "machines" that are intended to mark every man, woman, and child on earth. The NUMBER ONE parameter is ALL must have this "mark" to buy or sell, and it will be the mark of the BEAST supercomputers, and is ALREADY NOW happening in AMERICAN SCHOOLS - - - -

Are Christians Being Groomed to Accept The Coming Antichrist?
http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/lead-story298.htm
By Thomas Horn

Today I learned that Madras High School in the little town of Madras, Oregon is the latest government institution to allow students to pay for their lunch with the swipe of a hand.

Only yesterday in a related event, Chief of Police Jack Schmidig of Bergen County, NJ, a member of the police force for over 30 years, received a VeriChip implant as part of Applied Digital Solution's strategy of enlisting key regional leaders to accelerate adoption of its product.

Kevin H. McLaughlin, VeriChip Corporation's CEO said of the event that "High-profile regional leaders are accepting the VeriChip, representing an excellent example of our approach to gaining adoption of the technology."

The new and aggressive indoctrination program - Thought and Opinion Leaders to Play Key Role in Adoption of VeriChip - is intended to create widespread acceptance and exponential adaptation of the company's FDA-cleared, human-implantable RFID tag.

Earlier this year ADS provided testimony that safeguards have been implemented to ensure privacy in connection with implantable microchips. ADS received patent rights to Digital Angel (TM) technology on December 10, 1999. What set Digital Angel apart from the competition was the innovative design--a miniature digital transceiver specifically created for human implantation. According to information released last year the implantable transceiver "sends and receives data and can be continuously tracked by GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) technology. The transceiver's power supply and actuation system are unlike anything ever created. When implanted within a body, the device is powered electromechanically through the movement of muscles, and it can be activated either by the 'wearer' or by the monitoring facility.

An Information Technology report verified plans to study implantable chips as a method of tracking terrorists. After first pulling back from the implantable version of its Digital Angel, ADS foresees a unique use of its product under the new name VeriChip in the wake of terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. "We've changed out thinking since September 11," a company spokesman said, "Now there's more of a need to monitor evil activities."

ADS also claims the VeriChip (Digital Angel) has a variety of other uses, such as "providing a tamper-proof means of identification for enhanced e-business security, animal tracking, locating lost or missing individuals, tracking the location of valuable property and monitoring the medical conditions of at-risk patients."

Following the Internet World Wireless award for "Best of Show: Client Services," Mercedes Walton, President and CEO of Applied Digital Solutions, said: We have always had high expectations for the Digital Angel products. This award is truly a validation of our faith in Digital Angel's ability to capture the imagination of the public. Consumer anticipation has translated into accelerated interest from potential partners and allies. We are eager to bring Digital Angel to the marketplace in a very timely manner...."

To further advocate Digital Angel technology, Applied Digital Solutions launched a website http://www.digitalangel.net where viewers can peruse diagrams and read summary information.

Other manufacturers of sub-skin implants have quietly field-tested similar devices over the past few years. The London Times reported that, "Film stars and the children of millionaires are among 45 people, including several Britons, who have been fitted with the chips (called the Sky Eye) in secret tests."

Due to civil liberty and privacy issues, the ACLU announced opposition to mandatory microchip implantation when applied to humans. The ACLU is certain to be a strange bedfellow of conservatives concerning this issue.

THE FULFILLMENT OF PROPHECY?

Many people believe that, before long, an antichrist system will appear. It will be a New World Order, under which national boundaries dissolve, and ethnic groups, ideologies, religions, and economics from around the world will orchestrate a single and dominant sovereignty. The system will supposedly be free of religious and political extremes, and membership will tolerate the philosophical and cultural differences of its constituents. Except for minor nonconformities, war, terrorism, and hunger will be a thing of the past.

According to popular Biblical interpretation, a single personality will surface at the head of this utopian administration. He will appear as a man of distinguished character, but will ultimately become "a king of fierce countenance" (Dan. 8:23).

With imperious decree this Antichrist will facilitate the one-world government, universal religion, and globally monitored socialism. Those who refuse his New World Order will inevitably be imprisoned or destroyed, until at last he exalts himself "above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he, as God, sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God" (2 Thess. 2:4).

The Antichrist's widespread power will be derived at the expense of individual human liberties. He will force "all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six [666]" (Rev. 13:16-18).

For many years the idea that humans would somehow succumb to little more than branded cattle, and that rugged individualism would thereafter be sacrificed for an anesthetized universal harmony, was repudiated by America’s greatest minds.

Then, in the 1970’s, things began to change. Following a call by Nelson Rockefeller for the creation of a "New World Order," presidential candidate Jimmy Carter campaigned, saying, "We must replace balance of power politics with world order politics."

During the 1980's, President George Bush continued the one-world dirge, announcing over national television that "a New World Order" had arrived. Following the initial broadcast, President Bush addressed the Congress, saying, “What is at stake is more than one small country [Kuwait], it is a big idea--a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future!”

Ever since the President's astonishing newscast, a parade of political and religious leaders have discharged a profusion of rhetoric aimed at implementing the goals of a New World Order.

Developers of biometric implant chips employ similar language in announcing compatible global technologies, and many Americans consider electronically marking humans or implanting a series of digital equations beneath the skin to be the natural progress of these advancing and necessary technologies.

IT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE

Some people believe implantable microchips will become the Biblical Mark of the Beast. These claim that acts of Terrorism such as the ones in New York and Washington, encourage microchipping humans for identification purposes.

Yet even before the New York and Pentagon tragedies, a push was being made to brand and monitor humanity.

Consider the following:

1, As far back as 1973, Senior Scholastics introduced school age children to the concept of buying and selling using numbers inserted in their forehead. In the September 20, 1973 feature "Who Is Watching You?" the secular high school journal speculated: "All buying and selling in the program will be done by computer. No currency, no change, no checks. In the program, people would receive a number that had been assigned them tattooed in their wrist or forehead. The number is put on by laser beam and cannot be felt. The number in the body is not seen with the naked eye and is as permanent as your fingerprints. All items of consumer goods will be marked with a computer mark. The computer outlet in the store which picks up the number on the items at the checkstand will also pick up the number in the person's body and automatically total the price and deduct the amount from the person's 'Special Drawing Rights' account."

2, In the 1974 article "The Specter of Eugenics," Charles Frankel pointed out Linus Pauling's (Nobel Prize winner) suggestions that a mark be tattooed on the foot or forehead of every young person. Pauling envisioned a mark denoting genotype.

3, In 1980, U.S. News and World Report continued the warning, pointing out that the Federal Government was contemplating "National Identity Cards," without which nobody could work or conduct business.

4, The Denver Post Sun followed up in 1981, claiming that chip implants could someday replace I.D. cards. The June 21, 1981 story read in part, "The chip is placed in a needle which is affixed to a simple syringe containing an anti-bacterial solution. The needle is capped and ready to forever identify something--or somebody."

5, The May 7, 1996 Chicago Tribune questioned the technology, wondering aloud if we could trust Big Brother under our skin?

6, Then in 1997 applications for patents of subcutaneous implant devices for "a person or an animal" were applied for.

7, On April 27, 1998, Time Magazine ran the story, The Big Bank Theory And What It Says About The Future OF Money, in which they opined "Your daughter can store the money any way she wants--on her laptop, on a debit card, even (in the not too distant future) on a chip implanted under her skin."

8, In August 1998 the BBC covered the first known human microchip implantation.

9, That same month the Sunday Portland Oregonian warned that proposed medical identifiers might erode privacy rights by tracking individuals through alphanumeric health identifier technologies. The startling Oregonian feature depicted humans with barcodes in their foreheads.

10, And recently millions of Today Show viewers watched as the decade of prophetic warnings materialized when an American family got "chipped" with ADS's VeriChip™ live from a doctor's office in Boca Raton.

Since then, it's been business as usual with the chipping mantra.

Meanwhile, Terrorism has many people in the mood to sacrifice their liberties... a National ID Bill Masquerading As Immigration Reform is moving through the US Congress... and Digital Angel has expanded its mass production factory in Palm Beach, Florida.

WILL DIGITAL "MARKS" SOON BE MANDATORY?

Makers of implantable microchips claim the procedure will continue to be voluntary. But a report written by Elaine M. Ramish for the Franklin Pierce Law Center says: "A [mandatory] national identification system via microchip implants could be achieved in two stages: Upon introduction as a voluntary system, the microchip implantation will appear to be palatable. After there is a familiarity with the procedure and a knowledge of its benefits, implantation would be mandatory."

George Getz, the communications director for the Libertarian Party agrees, saying: “After all, the government has never forced anyone to have a driver license, [but] try getting along without one, when everyone from your local banker to the car rental man to the hotel operator to the grocery store requires one in order for you to take advantage of their services, that amounts to a de facto mandate. If the government can force you to surrender your fingerprints to get a drivers license, why can't it force you to get a computer chip implant?”

People like Mr. Getz are correct. Conservatives and liberals alike need to contact state and federal representatives and demand laws preserving individual rights before Digital Angel and similar forces lead humanity down a high-tech path of no return.

In the same way Social Security numbers were voluntary before becoming mandatory, biometric chip implants will be compulsory in the future unless citizens take immediate and national opposition. Even Applied Digital Solution's chief executive officer Richard Sullivan envisions a scenario where people [are] required to be chipped or [have] some combination of a device requiring them to be scanned and monitored at all times.'' [Read]

Last but not least, note what the prophet said.

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark [charagma; (Greek charax) meaning to stake into or "stick into"] in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark…" -- Rev. 13:16-17a

© 2005 - Thomas Horn - All Rights Reserved

Thomas is a nationally recognized lecturer, author, and businessman who has served 25 years in Christian ministry. A veteran speaker, researcher, and freelance writer, Tom has appeared on numerous radio and television programs worldwide, including Art Bell's "Coast to Coast" and Pat Robertson’s "The 700 Club." Tom’s new book ­ THE ARHIMAN GATE - fictionalizes ‘Big Brother’s’ role in the End Times. It is scheduled for release in the fall of 2005.

http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/lead-story298.htm

http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number/666/index.html

John revealed that the number of the beast -- the earthly establishment of Satan's kingdom -- which will tread down all the earth and make war with the saints will be 666. (Rev. 13:18.) Sadly, signs of the times ahead seem to be staring at us already. To a certain extent we already live in a day when "no man might buy or sell" without "the number of [the beast]...." (13:17.) Today, nearly every product we buy from the store has a UPC (Universal Product Code) symbol--commonly called a "bar code." All UPC codes have the number 666 encoded in them. Bar codes, in general, are made up of lines of various widths and distances apart. Each numeral has a two-line code--sometimes more than just one code per number.(1) One of the codes for a six is two thin lines, a short distance apart. There are basically two forms of UPC symbols: those that have two sets of five numerals written at the base and those that have one set of six numerals written at the base. Every UPC symbol of the first type begins with a six (in the bar code, not the numbers underneath), has a six in the center, and ends with a six: 6,6,6. The UPC symbol of the latter type also begins with a six, but it ends with two sixes (three thin lines encode two sixes, sharing the middle line): 6,66.

http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number/666/UPC_666_yes.htm



Greater Things > 666 Index > Rebuttal to "No Hidden 666 in UPC"


Rebuttal to "No Hidden 666 in UPC"

Q.

----- Original Message -----
From: ****
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 7:04 PM
Subject: UPC - 666 Connection

Tell me what you think...click below and check out this explanation:

http://www.vanguard.edu/faculty/R_Harris/barcode.htm

Write me back. I am a Christian who believed that the UPC contained 666 until today, May 3, 2000, after checking out that site. Write me back.



A.

I looked at the site you mentioned but am not convinced.

My source for documenting this more than a decade ago came from an IEEE Spectrum magazine (refereed scientific journal) that was talking about scanner technology. It had no intention whatsoever of addressing the issue of 666 in the bar code, but was presenting the code in a matter-of-fact way.

There they explained the code as I have presented it on my web site, especially in the "Vision of all" appendix.

Does that mean that the document you referred me to is bogus? No.

Rather, it illustrates what we so often see with the Bible. Two different people can interpret the very same thing in exactly opposite ways.

This man makes a decent case for one extreme.

However, the fact remains that whether intentional or not, the two thin lines are associated with six, and each bar code has the three sets of these. In the smaller version such as on spice bottles, the triplet lines on the right share the middle line making the ending 66. This I also got from the IEEE Spectrum article.

Let's say that this gentleman is correct, that in practice the scanners do not see "666" when they read the code. That does not eliminate the fact that the 666 is there for you and I to observe with our eyes.

Sterling D. Allan
May 3, 2000

REFERENCE
Takefumi Inagaki, "Hologram Lenses lead to Compact Scanners," IEEE Spectrum, vol. 26, no. 3, March 1989, pp. 39,40.

UPC Technology Explanation

666 in the barcode, and how the computer reads the code.

From: < rtenney1{at}comcast{dot}net >
To: [Sterling Allan]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 7:45 PM
Subject: UPC technology explanation


I had come across your site and followed the link to the rebuttal to Robert Harris. I have some insights for you.

I have been creating barcodes for a global consumer healthcare company since 1996 and had extensive training in various codes and their uses. There are many forms of barcodes, UPC, SCS, EV, Pharma and many others as mentioned by Mr. Harris. The UPC is the best of the best for containing and controlling the most information possible. He stated "in fact" how the UPC may be on the way out. I remind everyone this was written in 1999 and the UPC is used even more today at the end of 2005. The UPC's structure allows information within a database to be separated into partitions.

Although Mr. Harris makes a good case he is neglecting to make the difference between the human readable numbers at the bottom of the code and the actual scanned numerical breakdown of a UPC.

I am not saying he is wrong, I am just saying that he left out some important information. Let me explain.

Mr. Harris attempts, but fails, to properly answer the question, "Can we pick and choose the numbers?" His answer to this question eludes to the three sixes being part of the code number itself. However, not even the computer sees the exact number of the code. It calculates "down to" the human readable number we see at the bottom of the code.

Computers recognize numbers by not only the thickness of the bars, they also calculate this number by the spaces between the bars as well. The "guard bars", correctly called "bearer bars", at the beginning of every UPC are calculated by the two bars as well as the space between the bars.

What Mr. Harris questions is why the "human readable" number of the code doesn't include the three 6's.

I will break this down so that everyone can easily understand.

Every product that is sold must have a UPC. Notice that products around the globe all use the UPC. Check the history, eventually those few products or countries that don't use UPC's will switch in order to be linked to the world banking system.

Ok, when you buy a bar of soap the teller swipes the carton across the scanner which then adds this to the items sold to your receipt. At that moment, any database linked into the world banking system can see this transaction being made. "Everything goes through the World Banking System". Everything bought and sold on the world market goes through the same database. Our credit cards, debit cards & EFT's (Electronic Fund Transfers) all go through the World Banking System.

Well, how is this system accessed and activated? The two bars at the beginning, middle and end of the UPC control the entire transaction. The computer scans the first two bearer bars and calculates them into two 3's. Combined they calculate a 6 (3 + 3 = 6). This activates the tracking system and readies the computer for the transaction. The scanner then reads and calculates the manufacturer's information to allow the system to know what company the product belongs to.

At this point the computer needs an interruption in order to distinguish between the manufacturer and the product itself. This is the purpose of the middle bearer bars, then calculates the second set of 3's (6).

The scanner then reads the product information allowing the system to determine which product is being sold and how much the vendor is charging for this item.

At last, as with any program, the computer needs to end the transaction and calculates the final two 3's (6).

All of this takes a micro-second. But everything we purchase goes through this process. A six, or two 3's within the manufacturer or product info part of the code is not mistaken as a bearer bar because the computer is programmed to accept a specific number of "numbers" between information segments.

Broken down this simply means that in order to sell a product on the world market the product must have a link into the world banking system, a UPC. And the means of activating and creating partitions within the system to send and receive information are calculations of three sets of two 3's which end up calculating into three 6's.

This is also the reason why these 6's don't appear within the human readable numbers at the bottom of the UPC's. Because they are used to control the computer transaction. The human readable numbers are for our benefit only. They determine the manufacturer and the product. So if a manufacturer's number is 12345, you would not include the 6 at the beginning because it is not part of the manufacturer's number.

For another example, your personal information is stored in a database which is accessed by scanning the strip on the back of your driver's license. Let's say for example that the number your personal information is accessed by is your social security number. If your s.s.number is 123-456-7890 and the computer accesses and partitions information by a series of 6's, the computer may read your number as 6123456678906 but the human readable number is still the same. Get it?

Wrapping this up I simply want to add that Mr. Harris's information is mostly correct. He simply gave us a picture of what a code is by looking at the numbers at the bottom of the code and comparing them to the bars above them. This is actually misleading. A UPC is made up of 12 digits but the computer makes dozens of calculations to end up with the numbers we see at the bottom of the code. Mr. Harris began to make reference to these calculations but kind of missed the purpose of them and how they work. I tried not to get technical so everyone reading this would understand what I was pointing out. By removing all of the complicated jargon that only a computer programmer would understand I hope I simplified it enough that anyone would get it.

I have extensive "technical" guides on the breakdown and functional aspects of barcodes should anyone have any questions.

Also, please understand I am not point out this information to verify the UPC as the mark of the beast in any way. I am simply saying that the 6-6-6 is actually calculated within each UPC to "talk" with the world banking computer system. So in answer to everyone's question after reading Mr. Harris' UPC outline, "Yes, 666 does appear within each and every UPC but only as a series of calculated 3's".

Then again, maybe that's the point in Revelation 13:18 "This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666."

Thank you and I hope this information is useful.

Rick Tenney

http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number/666/index.html

ETC, ETC, ETC,,,, it's SO SIMPLE, and OBVIOUS (DUH) and I've talked with EXPERTS and WITNESSES from various INTELLIGENCE and GOVERNMENT positions who KNOW, and HAVE SEEN THE ACTUAL BEAST SUPERCOMPUTERS, not to mention the links and radio interview from yet MORE that I have given within this post.

SHeeZ, some people are truly "blind" and will never understand...

But alas, schoolkids are now being FORCED to take the mark, to "BUY" or "SELL" school lunches.

Hell AWAITS them. Tweet