CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Reread the Lancet article
 
resurrectionist Views: 3,308
Published: 20 y
 
This is a reply to # 567,072

Re: Reread the Lancet article


You conclude I am incorrect. About which points specifically and on what basis? Intuition? A hunch?

There's no missing information. You clearly don't understand quantitative and qualitative chemical analysis. As I say if you ask the wrong question. This is just avoiding an examination of the issues, something that happens quite frequently on this site. You can avoid changing your beliefs by insisting that this small point means the Lancet paper doesn't prove that green blobs are soapstones. The fact is you can't reasonably avoid that conclusion.
 

Share

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.305 sec, (1)