Afghan Osama bin Laden capture potential ignored!

Sen Kerry said in the debate last night [Sept 30 2004] that bin Laden was holed up in afghanistan, but U.S. soldiers who were nearby didn't come to help the Afghan warlords who were going to move on bin Laden's position in the hills.

That was something that was passed over real fast by the massmedia, and we all forgot about it until last night.

Kerry mentioned it because it is very important. Why did Bush, the commander in chief, not go after this most highly prized target of all? Let the warlords who the U.S. was fighting a week before take bin laden down for us? HA!!!

Obviously Bin Laden isn't someone Bush really wants to stop,
arrest, kill. We were told he was the prime target of the invasion of Afghanistan, but if that was true, then why didn't Bush try a little bit harder to nab him when he was so close?
The Bin Laden's special treatment on Sept 12, after 9-11 events they got to fly out of America "because of the feelings Americans might have towards them". Well ya!

So the same special treatment goes for Osama Bin Laden too. Kerry should persue this a bit more.... So should the voters.

IS IT TRUE THAT Bush supports Bin Laden, helped him commit 9-11? What does this say about Bush credibility?
Why would you vote for him, knowing that Bin Laden could have been caught, and the opportunity was ignored, instead we go into Iraq and remove Saddam, also known as "the blockage to Irai oil"!!, and then offer Haliburton all these bogus reconstruction contracts?

Sen Kerry struck a chord last night... Invading Iraq, 9-11, ignoring Osama's capture, - its all for the oil, the money, helping the elite friends of the Bush Adminsitration! That just seems so obvious now - America, your money has been stolen, your sons have been made pawns and sacrificed!!

Karlin
Tweet