Re: ND Experiencer Ned Dougherty's latest message from the Blessed Mother

I think this issue about the God of the bible being a wrathful and vengeful Creational force can be cleared up by looking at the bible from another perspective.

To put it simply, if one were to replace "God" with "ET"..things would make better sense. I won't outline all the details and indications/suggestions/inuendos in ancient manuscripts (not just the bible) that suggest ancient man was in intimate contact with ET's and had access to very advanced technology, because that would fill many books (and there are plenty of books & research material available to review, including a few about UFO/ET's in the bible, one even authored by a minister).

Instead I want to note that in light of the historic and present-day evidence of UFO/ET's (which is quite mind-boggling), we are able to look upon ancient manuscripts, myths/legends/lore, religions, and mysteries from a viewpoint that is more in keeping with the our current level of understanding.

It is hardly a stretch of the imagination to consider that if ET's interacted with humans (and may even have engineered Earth life, including humans) and fostered man's technological & social development, they (the ET's) may not have had an easy time of keeping the peace amidst a newly emerged (and perhaps unanticipated) barbarism which evolved out of human civilization.

Perhaps the ET agenda in this grand experiment was to create a perfect race (higher lifeform) capable of a greater capacity of awareness/feeling within a Utopia-like garden of eden; but things did not go as planned. Is it more sensible to view a creative God-force as being wrathful from disappointment in its creation, or is it more sensible to view the wrath coming from advanced ET's -- disappointed in their creation and how it has evolved, and as a result trying desperately to instill some measure of peace amongst a barbaric species. Whatever corrective action was attempted by ET had to be understood by a barbaric, backward-thinking race of people. Simple philosophy, words of wisdom, and spiritual insights would turn out to be not enough..and would fall on deaf ears for most. And when admonishments and warnings failed, they resorted to other methods -- like the "10 Commandments" (not very advanced, but simple and easy for barbarians to understand), performing "miracles" & visions, destroying wayward and decadent cities, portraying themselves as "angelic" beings harboring important messages from "God", and perhaps even to planting and educating the so-called "prophets" (Isiah, Enoch, Ezekiel, Jesus, Muhammed, etc.), complete with the ability to heal and perform "miracles", in order to directly educate the masses on a more personal and somewhat religious (because that's all they could understand) level. Of course we see that the result of the actions of these "prophets" was not successful..as mankind still has not transcended his attachment to primitive, narrow-minded religious doctrine. As a side note, ET may even have decided to help out Noah by warning him of an impending and very destructive flood (not global flood of course..but covering a large area at least)..and advising him to build a barge that could hold enough animals to be used to rebuild a viable farm once the waters subsided. One can see how over millenia such a story (among so many others) could be blown far out of proportion.

Is it not more reasonable then to think of an ET race (creator of humankind and life on Earth) as being perhaps wrathful in their disgust at how things turned out rather than a cosmic God-force being wrathful and vengeful?

Even today, with the majority of mankind still so heavily ingrained in a primitive religious mindset, the method of passing along important messages of prophetic warnings is still in visions and miracles. Which would work better, appearing to a horde of orthodox believers as an ET landing in a flying saucer, which they would not understand and could incite panic and fears of demonic invasion...or...appearing as something they are comfortable and familiar with -- the Virgin Mary, or some other religious symbol -- to pass on important messages & prophecies (complete with healing miracles of course)?

Of course, not all of mankind is still in this narrow-minded religious rut. Many, and the numbers are growing, are able now to accept the presence of ET..and in fact welcome it. Thus, we see the current level of UFO activity which appears to be intensifying -- crop circles, abductions, direct contact, sightings, fighter plane chases, radar interceptions, crash debris, NASA/space footage of UFO's, etc..etc. So today, we have the evidence supporting an ET presence for those who can accept it..while at the same time it is not so overwhelming that it is forced upon those who cannot accept it or are not ready to accept it. To land on the White House lawn is lunacy..as it would force EVERYONE to accept an ET presence, no matter at what level of acceptance and understanding they were at. But at the same time, providing evidence to their existance without risk of government involvement and secrecy cannot be tolerated. Thus, we have sightings, crop circles, etc. -- evidence that is available to ALL people worldwide, and which NO government can hide (now you know why SETI is not a good way for ET to communicate with man also). It seems ET is being careful in not interfering with the ingrained beliefs of mankind, but instead allowing for the gradual, yet steadily intensifying, introduction of their presence into everyone's reality.

This introduction into our reality would not be such a hardship for ET if it were not for the manipulations and corruption of governments spanning from countless generations up to now..which have dummed down humankind in so many ways through religion, politics, economics, commercialism, conventional medicine, environmental toxins, deceit, etc.

As an end note, it is vitally important for us all to come to terms with who has the real power in society. Is it government (our "leaders"), or is it us? The answer to this question will lead to the next question: whose dream are we living...our's or someone else's? Do you believe the naysayers when they tell you you're just a dreamer and that such and such is not possible? Is that true, or are they just conditioned to think that way? Ask yourself, how did this reality that we are currently living in come about? Yes..through someone's dreams/desires. Now, what makes THEIR dream/desire any more important than yours..or that of the rest of the world's peoples who basically desire only a simple life of peace and harmony? Is war, disease, destruction, and mass suffering the dream you want to live?

It would be wise to accept that the desire for a Utopia (which we CAN have) will not be achieved by following the leadership of another person..but by knowing yourself, thinking logically, educating oneself, constantly questioning, observing, and pondering the universe, and trusting in your own feelings and desires.

You folks take care! Tweet