Re: Can you please comment

Hi,

OK, so in the follow-up colonic irrigation following liver flushes that you've supervised, people were still passing stones in the material extracted.

But what I have to wonder is: Which liver flush method(s) did you use? Were you using Dr. Clark's, or were you using one outlined elsewhere (your own book?)? Dr. Clark's method induces some fairly strong diarrhea in order to flush the stones out, and it keeps the passages pretty liquid the whole time, not giving the stones much of an opportunity to settle anywhere or be impacted in the sludge along the intestinal lining (which should be drastically reduced courtesy of the colon cleansing which was performed, but let's say for the sake of argument that the cleanse was less than thorough). A plain ol' "just drink oil and juice" flush does not include the liquid diarrhea component, and so of course stones could find hiding places if the colon cleanse was insufficient.

Unfortunately, I cannot compare your liver flush method to Dr. Clark's without purchasing one of your books. We have nine separate liver flush methods listed at CureZone, but yours is not among them.

If you can tell me that you were using Dr. Clark's method, including the prerequisite (weeks of) colon cleansing, including the prerequisite (week or weeks of) parasite cleansing, and including the Epsom salt drinks, and including the instructions for eating on both the day of and the day after, precisely as she's stated, and yet you still found lots of liver stones or gall stones embedded in the material expelled during a follow-up colonic irrigation, then you have a legitimate basis for the claim you make, and I'll back down. But please let me know how many days following the flush you waited before performing the colonics; it's not really fair to do the colonic during the two days Dr. Clark says you can expect to see stones being passed.

I'm willing to bet, however, that you haven't tested Dr. Clark's procedure this way at all, and yet isn't this the only fair, valid method of evaluating her claims -- especially before implying danger in the method? Wouldn't you at least hope for that level of courtesy from others in the alternative field before they comment on your technique?

=-John-=
Tweet