CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Earpiece
 
  Views: 2,679
Published: 19 y
 
This is a reply to # 360,853

Re: Earpiece


I think if you take a look at/listen to? the interview up top I linked to, you will find it interesting. The man speaking was working on very stringent rsearch, all clearly, openly documented, independantly reviewed, all the best of the best of that sort of protocol-- the reason for all the stringency?

He was working FOR the Cell Phone interests, and they wanted to be absolutely certain the results could not be discounted. But what he found was NOT what they hoped to find. That began a series of events that left him threatened on every level:livelihood, health; his life...


Nevertheless, the research stands!

There is simply no question anymore that they are dangerous.

That said, he does not support blithely getting rid of them all. There are billions worlwide now...it would be impossible. He recommends ear-pieces, and says any cellphone sold without one now is a "defective" cellphone. There is a follow-up interview in those same archives, where supposdely two weeks after this interview is another that goes more into what steps you can take to protect yourself...

as far as a lifeline:

If I were going to the top of a mountain, or to Death Valley, I'd probably take one. The trouble is, no one just uses one for only emergencies....as for the towers; just one more piece in the puzzle of siruption to the anergy fields.

Funny they don't seem to have worked in Katrina, to provide what anyone might have expected in the way of 'help'...
 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.234 sec, (1)