Re: Computer monitor fluoresence - WORSE than mercury

While I understand you want to get across a health message, I don't understand the point of posting it here. I suppose traffic accidents kill more people than Amalgam illness, hence could be construed as being worse than mercury, but that is irrelevant to a forum devoted to Amalgam removal. Computer monitors may have been worse for you, but that hasn't been the case for me and many, many others battling mercury toxicity. My health issues existed decades prior to my exposure to computer monitors. Moreover, most of the illnesses that many have connected to mercury/heavy metal toxicity, such as candida, cfs, fibromyalgia, hypothyroidism, autoimmune disorders, and so forth have seen an explosion in modern society that predates widespread use of computer monitors on the part of the general public.

As regards some of your other comments, I doubt that Vitamin C is quite the hazard you make it out to be. People who ingest foods that are overly acidic will know it pretty quickly, and very few people who take large doses of Vitamin C do so in its acidic form, but buffered with sodium, calcium, or magnesium. If you have a sensitivity to things like buffered C, it wouldn't have anything to do with its acidity. The chlorine ion is a far more powerful acid than ascorbic, but in the form of sodium chloride (table salt), its pH is neutral because it is bonded to an equally powerful base.