Re: A different way to be safe and sure?

very interesting. I too have to leave, but my initial thoughts are that what you are describing sounds like a mix of remote viewing and kineseology. And I always feel that all these things -or aspects, or principles of them- do intersect, at some point.

I think you will find the book I mentioned really useful. It explores a lot of practical applications, though it gets a bit mechanized at some point, for me.
But maybe there, for you, it would 'open up'. hard to say.


You have some good ideas, fledgling. Good questions, which is, I suppose why these posts have found their way to a new forum.


One question, for later: are you proposing "X is good for me?" as a question for (a group of) someones, about one other? I call this proxy testing. But here, you are trying to find aggreement. The group reaching an intuitive consensus. I guess you are saying, if there is a 'truth' for any person, others could intuitively tune in.(?)


If so,
A lot of the principles of remote viewing apply here. This is covered in the book.

It's hard to talk about this stuff while the language is still new...




whereas, one can intuit. :-)

Wrenn makes some good points about the carefulness of the tuning in.
I do see applications for what you suggest, but I wonder too, why someone wouldn't want to learn to to this themselves. That said, I've known people who really yearned to be able to 'test' and somehow decided they could not 'do it'. I interpret that as
some inner resistance to 'knowing' amd possibly a ( conscious or not) self-distrust.

I've had to learn to ask about the truth of some things, and discover my own
willingness to know. That's a big hurdle for many.




Osal
Tweet