rod class & the "sovereign citizen myth" explained!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

***ALL NEW***ROD CLASS & THE "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" MYTH EXPLAINED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(CONTINUED FROM "ROD CLASS & SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED". PLEASE READ THAT COMMENT FIRST.)..... Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that a "SOVEREIGN" is an INDIVIDUAL and that the enemy of a "SOVEREIGN" is the GOVERNMENT of the state and all of the individuals in the state. But, this is not so. The government of the state and all of the individuals in the state IS THE "SOVEREIGN". The INDIVIDUAL IS NOT. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this. They get it EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) to what the truth actually is (a common problem in amateur legal theory).

Thus, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ACTUALLY OPPOSE THE VERY "SOVEREIGN" AND THE VERY "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT THEY CLAIM TO SUPPORT. This means that Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ARE ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of the "SOVEREIGN" and ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of "SOVEREIGNTY", not their supporters. But, they do not know enough to realize this. This is why many such amateur legal theorists (like Rod Class) find themselves on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST (because they actually oppose the "SOVEREIGN" and because they actually oppose "SOVEREIGNTY").

This fundamental mistake (the belief that the INDIVIDUAL is "SOVEREIGN") reflects that the terms, "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" are perhaps the single most misused and misunderstood terms in all of amateur legal theory.

BACKGROUND: Originally in politics, a "SOVEREIGN" was a SINGLE "MONARCH" (King or Queen) GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE who GOVERNED a nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the nation state. Originally, the RIGHT of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN its own nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE was that MONARCH's right of "SOVEREIGNTY".

Then and now, a "SOVEREIGN" meant/means a "GOVERNMENT" OF ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state. Then and now, "SOVEREIGNTY," meant/means that GOVERNMENT’S RIGHT TO GOVERN ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE.

THE STATES: But, here in the United States, we rejected the notion of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state. Here in our country, we adopted a republican form of government whereby "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) GOVERNED our own states and all of the INDIVIDUALS in our own state COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTED representatives of our own STATE.

So, here in our country, THE STATE ITSELF, which consists of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) became "SOVEREIGN" (which still means THE GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). This means that in our country THE STATE ITSELF legally stands in the shoes of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear. So, in our country, THE STATE ITSELF GOVERNS the STATE and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state (instead of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear). But, the right, power and authority of THE STATE ITSELF as a "SOVEREIGN" and the right, power and authority of the MONARCH of yesteryear as a "SOVEREIGN" ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. In our country, a "SOVEREIGN" IS STILL A "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE, but a "SOVEREIGN" is no longer a SINGLE MONARCH.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Thus, In our country, the term, "SOVEREIGN" is a term THAT ONLY APPLIES TO A GOVERNMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY (AS A WHOLE) AND NOT TO A SINGLE "CITIZEN", INDIVIDUAL OR PERSON INDIVIDUALLY. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to realize this. They get it EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) to what the truth actually is.

Here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE. So, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). As a result, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL does not GOVERN the STATE or any of the INDIVIDUALS in the state.

THE UNITED STATES: The United States ITSELF is also a SOVEREIGN nation state consisting of a union of MEMBER SOVEREIGN STATES. So, here in the United States, THE STATES and the United States are both "SOVEREIGN" GOVERNMENTAL HEADS OF STATE (WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS AS DIFFERENTIATED BY SUBJECT MATTER IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION).

This means that here in the United States, THE STATE AND THE UNITED STATES OCCUPY THE SAME EXACT LEGAL POSITION (AND HAVE THE SAME LEGAL RIGHT, POWER AND AUTHORITY TO GOVERN THE STATE AND ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE STATE) AS DID THE SINGLE MONARCH OF YESTERYEAR, except that the powers of the United States (as distinguished from the individual STATES) are limited to those powers expressly delegated to it in the United States Constitution (a tiny list of subjects), whereas the powers of the individual STATES (as distinguished from the United States) have no such limitation.

Here in the United States, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" COLLECTIVELY (NOT INDIVIDUALLY) through our VOTES. ---Thomas Jefferson (see below). Thus, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" through our ELECTIONS.

But, as INDIVIDUALS, none of us are “SOVEREIGN”(which still means the GOVERNMENT of a state) and as INDIVIDUALS, none of us can exercise any "SOVEREIGNTY" (which still means the right to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state). In our country, we no longer recognize a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (or “MONARCH”) as “SOVEREIGN”. In our country, no single INDIVIDUAL is the GOVERNMENT OF A STATE. This is why, in our country, no INDIVIDUAL can be "SOVEREIGN" (WHICH STILL MEANS A GOVERNMENT OF A STATE).

APPLICATION: This is why every amateur legal theorist who claims to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE) always LOSES on that issue with law enforcement officers and in court. This is why all law enforcement officers and all courts always treat such amateur legal theorists as the mere INDIVIDUALS that they really are. Amateur legal theorists who claim to be "SOVEREIGN" (a government of a state) to law enforcement officers and in court do nothing but demonstrate their IGNORANCE of the law and their IGNORANCE of history--- AND THEY ALWAYS LOSE!

WHAT YOU CAN DO: If you do not like the laws, the ELECTED legislators, the ELECTED executive officers or the ELECTED judges or the ELECTED prosecutors, then do something about it. VOTE OR RUN FOR OFFICE. Pretending to be an INDIVIDUAL, GOVERNMENT OF A STATE (a “SOVEREIGN” MONARCH) has never, and will never work for you as a “defense” to the application of any law, the jurisdiction of any law enforcement officer or court or to the consequences any arrest, charge or conviction.

CONCLUSION: IN OUR COUNTRY, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" (OR OTHERWISE "SOVEREIGN"). HERE, AND ELSEWHERE, ONLY A GOVERNMENT CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN". So, in our country, an INDIVIDUAL cannot "get his SOVEREIGNTY back". This is because, In our country, NO INDIVIDUAL WAS EVER "SOVEREIGN" IN THE FIRST PLACE.

DEFINITION:

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/Sovereign.aspx

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sovereign

THE LAW:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2459141824775540924&q=%22Thomas+jefferson+stated+over+150+years+ago+that+%5Bit+is%5D+by+their+votes+the+people+exercise+their+sovereignty%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2011726581563609832&q=++%22is+not%22+%22beyond+the+jurisdiction%22+%22of+the+courts%22+%22regardless+of+an+individual%27s+claimed+status%22+%22no+conceivable+validity%22+%22argument+that+a+defendant+is+a%22+%22rejecting+the%22+individual+repeatedly+rejected+sovereignty+sovereign+citizen&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16993091562091245184&q=%22The+...%22+theory+%22are+not+established+law%22++%22The+...theories+of+...%22++rejecting+argument+%22to+be+to+wholly+insubstantial+and%22+frivolous+%22finding+the%22+sovereign+citizens+citizen+%22This+is+a%22+%22legal+theory+that+is+consistently+rejected%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16820160598854753158&q=%22in+this+country%27s%22+%22legal+system%22++%22theories+of+%27sovereign+citizens%27+are+not+established+law%22+%22Plaintiff%27s+purported+status+as+a+sovereign+citizen+does+not+enable+him+to+violate+state+and+federal+laws+without+consequence%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15013050720983506132&q=refuse+refusal+refusing+bizarre+misguided+citizens++%22have+never+proven+effective%22+anti-government+movement+misplaced+%22out+of+context%22+incoherent+obsolete+antigovernment+movements+extremists+irrational+antics+sovereign+citizen+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

Rod Class is: 1). a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education; 2). the victim of a PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS; 3). a TWO-TIME, WEAPONS-RELATED, CONVICTED FELON; 4). a person who has LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (MORE THAN 73 CASES); 5). a person who has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST; and 6). a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER and CHARLATAN. Tweet