Re: Explanation of Dr. Clark's intended use of zappers.

I'm just pulling quotes from a book. You are the one making all sorts of assumptions and interpretations.

BTW

The name of the book is called

The Cure For All Diseases .

She was not pulling any punches with the title of the book, nor with any of the information or claims when it was written.

I'm just agreeing with parazapper here that Dr. Clark made a clear distinction between zappers and frequency devices. They are vaguely similar but not the same by any stretch. Clark laid it out clearly that one would cure Tapeworms and the other could make things worse.

Hmmmm

Lots of of people having problems with dissemination in the forums - something that Dr. Clark warned about by using zappers incorrectly.


You guys are the sticklers for protocols, something that I actually agree with. You opened up that can o' worms not me, so I'll be happy to oblige with being a stickler from here on in.


Then when I do agree and point out the words of the (single) author you are almost always quoting you seem to have a problem with that.

I agree more with parazapper in general now that he has toned things down. He is not overselling the effectiveness of the zapper like you and in point of fact he is mainly manufacturing frequency devices and not zappers - though I think he also sells those as well. He is more in the rife camp than the zapper camp and they are most probably more effective than zappers. He also acknowledged the SPOOKY2 as being a good device.