I was hoping that you would not reply to that, was baiting for someone else to reply. You beat them to it.

Yes, Dr. Clark claimed that it could kill flukes but it had a difficult time in reaching the organs.

This is why I tried using it for this purpose back several years ago.

I was completely surprised that many others did not jump all over that claim.

I have felt all along though that the zapper did not directly kill the worms but caused them to die by killing their gut flora. Many of these worms require a bacterium named Wohlbacteria. If you kill that bacterium, the worms die in short time.

This information is on a number of sites such as NIH, etc.

You read what, like 3 pages??? She talks constantly about zapping parasites with the zapper, not a frequency generator. She describes when her son accidentally stumbled on her form of zapper which she discovered kills with the positive off set square wave, ALL pathogens.

Her warning was to make sure, with tape worm especially, to kill them WITH a zapper.

"Help your body dispatch the Tapeworm stages all together with your zapper. A frequency generator is bound to miss some.Some cysticercus varieties consist of many heads, and each head has even more heads inside it! These might have different resonant frequencies. Only killing them together has the desired effect." 'Cure for all diseases', page 199

And parasites thrive the more toxic we get. So, the zapping is hardly a moot point. The more toxic we get, the more we need to zap, because the parasites move in and start eating on you quicker, the more toxic you become.

And hyper-infections (if such things as described here even actually exist outside curezone) are a lot more rooted in improper drug usage than zapping. I zap and have done so for years--and I don't even get sick any more. So, needless to say, I sincerely doubt all those 'stories'.

As for proving what she found to be true, get yourself a sycrometer like she had. It tests for the presence of anything in the body via frequency resonance (far ahead of her time) and registers whether it's there or not. They've been improving them over Europe but of course not a hint of that technology is mentioned in America. That's how she knew if what she was doing was working or not. Refer to this gal, in Europe, series of posts about it, starting here:

//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2301018#i

And yeah, overhauling your lifestyle to be rid of toxins is a good thing, but no, I haven't found it necessary at all. I even still have my Amalgam fillings (or at least what's left of them after oil pulling destroyed some as a great advertisement of effectiveness as it pulled the mercury out and ruined it's integrity, and they fell apart and fell out. Blah).

I'm sure doing that might take my 95% healthy to 100%. I am not really gonna bother with all that though, and I think it's up to each individual to decide how far they want to go. Obviously if your furnace is leaking, or you live on an ex-superfund clean-up site, you need to do something, but anyone with half a brain is already trying to do something.

And obviously his desire for people to desist with their repeated and yet still ignored when answered questions to stop, I don't blame him. He's posted a bizillion times answers to every single question he keep's getting asked.

And it sure didn't stop YOU from complaining at all.

>- frequency generators ... not zappers

In reality, a zapper is basically a frequency generator that only generates 1, 2, or sometimes many more frequencies. Also, by generating a true square wave, it actually generates many frequencies at the same time through the production of harmonics.

A note should be presented here: A square wave can only generate odd harmonics, it is a mathematical law.

>- using a zapper might be more dangerous than some people realize if not done 'correctly'.

Yes, this is very true and it is why I wrote the book " parasite Zapping and the Zapper". It is presented to provide information for the average user. What to do, what not to do, what works better and what does not work so well.

>- exposed to solvents anywhere this whole notion of correctly using a zapper becomes sort of moot.

That is where we disagree for sure. I have had hundreds of customers who live in these conditions who tell me that having a zapper makes all the difference in the world.

For example: There are many who live in mold infested houses that can not leave them, they can not afford to move somewhere else. They are stuck and must find some alternative to help them survive.

In other cases, they work in factories or mills where they are exposed to various things that makes them very susceptible to many different types of infections.

>- The zap three times was just speculation on Dr. Clark's part about the alleged hierarchy of organisms that live on/in helminths.

This was part of the questions that were in the surveys that I sent out. Each user was asked how long they zapped, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 7 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, or 1 hour or more continuous. Then how many times they repeated the zap: 1 time, 2 time, 3 time, 4 time 5 times or more.

Then not only were they asked to rate how they felt that the zapping was helping, they were asked a long series of questions about conditions and improvements.

We then took the levels of improvements reported and also their feeling about how well it worked and compared it to the method that they used, how long, and how many times,

What we found that those who zapped less than 7 minutes did not have much success, and also those who zapped less than 3 time is a session also had much poorer results unless that zapped for 1 hour or longer continuous. Those who zapper 10 minutes and 4 times or more were the real winners.

As a note: Most used 15 to 20 minute breaks.

I believe that this supports both the 7 minute minimum and the 3 times or more suggestions.

>- It could be factual it or could be nonsense, no one will likely ever be able to prove this

I doubt, at least, that any serious research will ever be done as long as the use of zappers is suppressed and demoted.

>- it's more of a complete lifestyle overhaul than a parasite protocol.

Absolutely, I agree with that. It comes down to deciding how long and how well you really want to live. Sometimes, it is just plain necessary to make sacrifices. Sometimes, some people get away with just doing part of it.

>- if you do all of these things she says you can get reinfected on the drop of a dime

Some truth to that but then again, I will bet that you are far less likely to be reinfected.

Hey, My wife and I have 6 rescue dogs in the house and close to 30 chickens.

>- certain infections will never go away until all dentalwork is replaced

She may be correct on that point, however, I believe that I have had fairly decent success in controlling dental infections using multi-frequency zappers. And, perhaps that control may be enough to make the necessary difference. If the infection is not there, then much of the problem goes away.

>- Who are you to tell people what they can or cannot complain about?

I think that it is completely unfair to complain about something that you have not actually tried. Plain and simple. Also, complaints are not very helpful to most unless they contain a reasonable description of the issue and what happened with it.

>- you will have much better results if you zap and take the recommended herbs

Agreed, and I think that if you look back there was probably a point early in the discussion when that approach was used but was likely ignored.

I will however, try to remember this and use this approach more often.

Going back to the first issue of frequency generators, If you look at the products offered by ParaZapper, they are frequency generators with specific frequencies that are intended to produce certain specific results. ParaZapper has been way beyond a regular zapper for many years now. It is still a zapper because it uses positive offset square waves to produce a wide range of harmonics and this type of multiple frequency zapper is far more likely to be successful that the older single and dual frequency models.

Well Iodine my dearest... (or is that loquat? Sounds much more like him, and I know he hacks passwords well), if she was being hounded like parazapper, and had to be super careful not to make claims about her zapper, leaving it to implications, well if you can't read what she really meant in every paragraph of most of her book, you probably miss a lot when you read. :(

Nit pick much??