Re: What. if. the .

i like that you accept the obvious reality of intelligent design in one form or another :).

i believe the theory that non human primates evolved to humans is exceedingly weak in the actual fact department and thrives primarily through the propaganda of creative speculations, creative drawings and men with an agenda in this case those with a vested interest in keeping Theory of Evolution alive. Once again such an immense transformation would require a substantial amount of new genetic information (new and improved dna programming language, blueprints for every function of life, etc) which genetic mutations and natural selection have not demonstrated themselves as being anywhere near capable of producing. Such an idea only exists in the imaginations of men who call themselves scientists but merely speculate, assume and propagandize their ideas rather than employing actual scientific principals and methods and practicing actual science.

If a non human primate can supposedly become a human in roughly 10,000 generations (something for which i have seen no convincing evidence whatsoever in the ever continuing search for that "missing link"), why then are fruit flies which are bred and intentionally mutated still nothing but fruit flies after 100,000 generations? Tweet