CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: The great iodine debate
  Views: 1,636
Published: 7 years ago
This is a reply to # 2,212,830

Re: The great iodine debate

My use of the word "bunglers" was in reference to a hypothetical situation involving stock market exchanges.

If you wish to take it out of context and apply it to people who post on a forum, I cannot stop you.

There is no argument about the amount of Iodine needed. The amount "needed" varies from individual to individual. You can't refute that, so, there's no argument.

Like I said, just personality conflicts here, like you are trying to fan the flaming flames of, by referencing "grizz" and insinuating I've called anybody on this board a bungler.

Stooges would be a better word. By the way, your use of the word "needed" is indefinite. You never specified "needed" for what ? i.e., a different amount is needed to just barely survive, than the amount needed to flush heavy metals from the body. So it is only natural that people need different amounts of iodine, depending on many factors, including the result they have in their sights.


Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021

0.422 sec, (1)