Re: More modern synchrometer?

As I said before, I could not get the synchrometer to work before but I have to accept that it may just be partly my fault because I have heard from others who claimed success.

I agree with you that electronically, the circuit as designed is not likely to function as described. Clark, however, did not know a lot about electronics so maybe there was some errors in the expression of the circuit for that reason. What I am saying is that it may well be possible that the circuit was flawed ( in my opinion, it missed the boat completely ) due to a lack of understanding the electronics involved while the idea may have a valid basis.

As for the Frenchmen, is this limited to them? ( TIC )

Only one more reason not to like the ADA. Anti-floss, pro-fluoride, pro-mercury.

My point AK is that I think that if a person as knowledgeable as you were to go back and re-read how her circuit was supposed to work, I believe that you could make it work electronically, that is if her theories are correct.

So let me interject about the validity of frequencies from what I have learned.

If you take and populate several petri dishs or culture tubes with 20 species of bacteria and zap them with a certain frequency ( 2500 Hz for example ) some species will be completely killed, some will be partially killed, and others will remain unaffected. If you do another sample and use 2600 Hz, a different set of results will be seen. At 2400 Hz, even a different set of results will be seen.

The results also show a few other things.

1) any frequency will kill some microbes and if used long enough, may kill many different species.

2) Adding a second frequency so that you are using 2 different frequencies appears to increase the chance of
affecting any random microbe by 30 percent to 40 percent. My experiments support the idea that adding additional frequencies will asymptotically approach the point of killing all species of microbes.

3) I find that between 4 and 8 specific frequencies in succession with a minimum time for each frequency will affect a very broad population of microbes. This experiment was culminated with the visual demonstration of the two jars that I posted previously.

Again, I feel that Clark was partially correct and partially wrong in her theories but the electronic application of both the synchrometer and the speaker box zappicator were wrong and completely non-functional in my experience.