Re: West Nile Virus: they're lying to you again

Hi Tony,

nice to see this one posted as well.

Id would in fact be interested in seeing qualified proof of the existence of pathogenic viruses.

& by qualified proof I mean direct methods that can be and have been repeated.

Not the PCR or Antibody testing that are indirect and too generalised to indicate specific accuracy.

Nor the various filtration methods that claim to separate out material of specific density and size.

This link provides interesting insight into the centrifugal sepeartion process and why filtration methods are not reliable therefore not proof that particles can be 100% isolated!

To date I have not come across a genuine electron micrograph that can be reliably be proven (and repeated) to be a specific pathogenic virus - since the above methods can not be relied on to be 100% proof i can therefore only conclude that there is no proof in existence as none have been directly observed to cause the cellular pathology.

It is my opinion that "virus" is myth and that it is a misdirection from the path that researchers like Naessens pointed towards whereby bacterial particles undergo changes in upto iirc 16 stages.

Also since viruses are purportedly endogenous in origin I find it extremely difficult to beleive that in evolutionary terms that a complex multicellular biological system such as a mammal could fall victim to such cellular chicanery.

- just my opinion at present until something better comes along!
- but I do think that tricky pasteur set in motion one of the biggest medical frauds in history (history being another one)