Re: "your types" Hunh!?

"Because of your types, the schooling books are made so you must complete the book before you can receive another. There are those that want to learn and those that want a shortcut that goes nowhere in life. sadly most today prefer to buy there way out and not take the time to learn.

There are 16,000+ great medical books from the past. I suggest you read them all."



I had to copy and paste the whole thing -- sorry, but I want to be sure I know what I'm responding to.


Mh, this is mystifying...

I read just a little while back, just after your return I think, you said (somewhat defensively) that nothing you write is to any 'one': that you don't check names or know who is who: that you are aware many people read this site, and you always respond to posts in the collective...

very well. So, you're using this post to make the point that you "make these schooling books"? (okay good. I think we all are aware of this)

To make the point that some 'want a shortcut that goes nowhere'?

Okaayy...yes, very 'true'..but it's such a non sequiter- here, that it almost reads like comedy!(or, it makes no sense, and your post is based on a misapphrehension of mine?)

I know you don't like to engage in long debates, and neither do I. (talk about (the illusion of )a "shortcut that goes nowhere"!)


But honestly, I have to ask: who is "your types?"

(This was a simple post aimed at anyone out there who might be looking to find/read the book mentioned. Many come to read this site, as you know, and many agree with your assertion that 'everyone is equal', none greater than another.

And many agree to - as you've suggested - read a lot.

I can only guess you are surmising and reacting to 'a type that wants to read all sorts of things, putting C before A', and all that. (You seem frustrated by that, lately.) I appreciate that you feel you have absorbed the best of many, many books, and spent much time in your quest to uncover the truth of things. And I respect much of what you do. I also have read enough of what you say to see that while you encourage others to find out the truth of things, more and more, (again, lately) you seem impatient and embittered that anyone wouldn't want to take what *you* have (already) discovered, and treat your knowledge as the only necessary 'school' out there.

This is odd, since you also often enough enough refer to (your place in ) the lineage of Christopher -- and with much respect. Why on earth then, would you respond to this simple post with a "your types" knee-jerk reaction?


If it is to send a collective message out there to all those that (in your estimation) will not learn the basics, but want to forge ahead, well, I can only say I think your aim is misplaced.


I believe it is as Dandelion has graciously suggested. Wrong place and time...

No disrespect meant, but if not that, and you are against the sharing of information (amongst many)on this forum, maybe just say so up front.

Otherwise, it would not seem to ask too much that you post your own message.
Many (including me)enjoy reading you essays on whatever topic is at the forefront of your thinking; this was really the wrong place to shoehorn it in, in my view. Or maybe, it was just that it seemed, frankly, rude. And I don't believe being plain-talking and 'down to earth' necessitates rudeness.


has there been some sort of misunderstanding?

Osal



Tweet