Re: RAW Milk consumption is not a risk factor for prostate cancer

I think a major hole in these kind of studies is the use of "milk" as an all encompassing term. Unpasteurized, unprocessed milk from local grass fed cows is medicine, pure and simple.

That is a matter of opinion.  Cow's milk still contains hormones derived from the animal itself.  And cow's milk does have other things going against it such as its ability to break down the bones whether or not it is raw.

You can heal yourself with raw milk and raw egg yolks - doctors used this "therapy" a hundred years ago before pharma stepped in to make a buck off of us.

The stuff in groceries (even the organic) is grey and tastes terrible in comparison. Not only that it causes allergies in gluten intolerant folks because the cows are grain/soy/other stuff? fed.

Any proof to back this claim?  From credible sources, not sales sites or opinion sites.  Just any proof that the gluten protein makes it in to the milk.

The milk I get from my local dairy is creamy, yellowish-orange, and fresh. It tingles on the tongue and is full of natural probiotics and soluble vitamins and minerals. Not "fortified."

Fortified vitamins are also soluble.

Let's use common sense. Humans have been thriving for thousands of years on cow/goat/yak/horse/camel milk. When factory farming took over and we started processing ALL our food, we started having health issues.

Not all milks have the same properties.  Goat's milk for example contains much smaller protein molecules making it considerably easier to digest.

Humans have also thrived on mother's milk since the beginning of time.  But mother's milk does not make you gain 300 pounds in a month like cow's milk does for a calf.  Again, there is a major difference in chemistry.  So let's not use "milk" in an all encompassing term.

If real milk caused issues I think the human race would have died out long ago from prostate cancer.

You mean all humans have a prostate?

By the way, "risk factor" does not mean will cause 100% of the time.