Has the CDC ever found a vaccine that it did not embrace?

None of which warrants vaccinating with a vaccine that has not been proven to be effective long-term, which only protects against some of the strains of HPV in the first place, has not been tested for long-term safety, has been questioned as to safety and effectiveness by a lead developer of the vaccine and which has already proven to have four times the adverse reactions of any other childhood vaccine.

Notably, Gardasil was developed by Merck - the same company which gave us the deadly Vioxx drug which has killed more people than we lost in the entire Viet Nam war.  It later was found that Merck hid evidence of harm, rigged studies and paid doctors and researchers to put their names on papers written by Merck.  Vioxx was finally pulled after years of Merck stonewalling and lying after the body counts grew to be too large to cover-up or ignore.  You will likely see similar results with Merck's deadly Fosamax bone drug.  Can there be any doubt that Merck is using the same kind of tactics to promote Gardasil - which was developed to be the cash cow for Merck to replace lost Vioxx revenue?  If so, see these articles I wrote:

Gardasil’s trail of deception hides the true scope of deaths and injuries

Gardasil Risks Magnified for Sexually Active Women and Expectant Mothers

Merck Sponsored Study Returns Dubious Gardasil Autoimmune Safety Results

For more information, go to the SANEVax site, of which I have been a contributing author.

http://sanevax.org/

Question: has the CDC ever found a vaccine that it did not embrace and promote?