i wasn't there obviously, so I, like most everyone else has to do their homework and go with their gut. A few obvious distortions in "history". Certinaly there were concentration camps, but were they set up for the purpose of killing or was that the end result when the entire country ran out of food during the war? Are the numbers of dead exagerated and used for propaganda? Did the deaths happen how we are told they happened? what other types of people starved in the camps?
remembering too that the victors write history as they see fit...
to me, the transfer agreement is very telling and suggestive as to what might really have happened.