Disagreement alone does not constitute a personal attack

H,

What I posted was in no way an attack on you. My post simply disagreed with your minority opinion that viruses cause all ALL leukemia (except radiaton caused ALL leukemia) and with your minority opinion that most cancers are caused by viruses.  In doing so, I echoed the vast majority of opinion within and outside mainstream medical science.

The reason I made my post was not to attack you, but rather to give what I believe is good advice to the original poster and to all who have cancer or cancer concerns -  which is that the best idea would be to address all possible root causes of ALL and cancer. No matter how many links you post to support your minority opinion, doing so will nevertheless not change reality and turn it into a majority opinion.  Besides, no matter how many ALL or cancer cases might be caused by viruses, there would still be other causes and the wise thing to do would be to not overlook them. 

Let's suppose for a moment that you are wrong, hard as that appears to be for you to do.  Or let's even suppose that you were mostly right and that only a minority of ALL and a minority of cancers were caused by something other than viruses.  If the original poster or anyone else who had cancer were to treat it only as having a viral root cause and it didn't, that might not only make it harder to eliminate the ALL of other cancer, it would likely make the return of ALL or other cancer more likely due to failure to address the true root cause.

What I posted wasn't about you, H, it was about trying to give prudent advice so that the original poster and other would have the best chance of both beating their conditions and preventing their return.

I note that you edited your first response to change "his cure does not address the root cause of cancer" - after I pointed out that my suggested protocold (never referred to as a cure, btw) did indeed address just about all recognized root causes of cancer - to "his oleandersoup" and added negative information about oleander to help prop up your subsequent post.  Both of your posts are glaring examples of how you wrongly try to twist any disagreemet with you into a personal attack and how you try to retaliate. Disagreement with what you post is not a TOS violation.  The TOS violations occur when you wrongly equate disagreement with personal attack and proceed with actual personal attacks of your own.

Though both of your posts beg for moderation, I  have decided that I am going to leave them up for the time being so that others can see the examples of how you react to disagreement (though I cannot speak about what others may decide to do about your posts - I am not the only moderator of this forum, nor am I the overall moderator of the entire website).  I am also not at this time taking the step of moving the entire thread to the debate forum(s) out of courtesy to the original poster to allow other constructive posts to be made here in the support forum.

I will, however, once again state in no uncertain terms that further debate here in the support forum will not be tolerated and neither will any additional personal shots.