CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Comparing hot dogs to vegetables and natural fruit sugar to HFCS? - edited to delete duplicate info
 
Hveragerthi Views: 5,617
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,664,825

Re: Comparing hot dogs to vegetables and natural fruit sugar to HFCS? - edited to delete duplicate info


 One problem with studies is that there are generally other studies refuting the one study.  This is why one study cannot be relied on as evidence.  For instance these studies that refute the fructose-pancreatic cancer study:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19277880

Cancer Causes Control.

 2009 Aug;20(6):835-46. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

Sweets, sweetened beverages, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large population-based case-control study.

Chan JMWang FHolly EA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. june.chan@ucsf.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the associations between sweets, sweetened and unsweetened beverages, and sugars and pancreatic cancer risk. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study (532 cases, 1,701 controls) and used multivariate logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Because associations were often different by sex, we present results for men and women combined and separately. RESULTS: Among men, greater intakes of total and specific sweets were associated with pancreatic cancer risk (total sweets: OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.0, 3.6; sweet condiments: OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.1; chocolate candy: OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.0; other mixed candy bars: OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5, 7.3 for 1 + servings/day versus none/rarely). Sweets were not consistently associated with risk among women. Sweetened beverages were not associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk. In contrast, low-calorie soft drinks were associated with increased risk among men only; while other low-/non-caloric beverages (e.g., coffee, tea, and water) were unassociated with risk. Of the three sugars assessed (lactose, fructose, and sucrose), only the milk sugar lactose was associated with pancreatic cancer risk (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.5, 2.7 comparing extreme quartiles). CONCLUSION: These results provide limited support for the hypothesis that sweets or sugars increase pancreatic cancer risk.

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18689380

Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):431-40.

Added sugar and sugar-sweetened foods and beverages and the risk of pancreatic cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Bao YStolzenberg-Solomon RJiao LSilverman DTSubar AFPark YLeitzmann MFHollenbeck ASchatzkin AMichaud DS.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. ybao@hsph.harvard.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it has been hypothesized that hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin resistance are involved in the development of pancreatic cancer, results from epidemiologic studies of added sugar intake are inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate whether the consumption of total added sugar and sugar-sweetened foods and beverages is associated with pancreatic cancer risk. DESIGN: In 1995 and 1996, we prospectively examined 487 922 men and women aged 50-71 y and free of cancer and diabetes. Total added dietary sugar intake (in tsp/d; based on the US Department of Agriculture's Pyramid Servings Database) was assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated with adjustment for total energy and potential confounding factors. RESULTS: During an average 7.2 y of follow-up, 1258 incident pancreatic cancer cases were ascertained. The median intakes for the lowest and highest quintiles of total added sugar intake were 12.6 (3 tsp/d) and 96.2 (22.9 tsp/d) g/d, respectively. No overall greater risk of pancreatic cancer was observed in men or women with high intake of total added sugar or sugar-sweetened foods and beverages. For men and women combined, the multivariate RRs of the highest versus lowest intake categories were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.06; P for trend = 0.07) for total added sugar, 1.01 (0.82,1.23; P for trend = 0.58) for sweets, 0.98 (0.82,1.18; P for trend = 0.49) for dairy desserts, 1.12 (0.91,1.39; P for trend = 0.35) for sugar added to coffee and tea, and 1.01 (0.77,1.31; P for trend = 0.76) for regular soft drinks. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the hypothesis that consumption of added sugar or of sugar-sweetened foods and beverages is associated with overall risk of pancreatic cancer.

 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.281 sec, (7)