Re: AIDS denialists are dangerous. I found out the hard way.

At the end of the day there is sooooooooo much that simply does not make sense with the HIV=AIDS science - having said that I do not dispute the high correlation of testing positive and then developing immune issues it is just an enigma that nobody has been able to conclusively prove HIV is the culprit for the CD4 destruction.

Here are some alternative hypothesises for you

http://drbroxmeyer.netfirms.com/001%20REV%20PDF%20IN%20PRESS%20AIDS%20%20ITS%...

And from the same authors:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/hiv_tuberculosis.pdf

Quote:

"In a startling new report, a team of Slovakian researchers headed by Vladimir Zajac has found genetic sequences of HIV ( the human immunodeficiency virus) in various bowel bacteria cultured from AIDS patients. It is well-known that HIV attacks blood cells of the immune system, but this is the first study indicating HIV can also infect bacteria naturally contained within the body. This novel finding gives rise to further questions concerning the transmissibility of HIV and the role that HIV-infected bacteria play in the transformation of HIV infection to full-blown clinical AIDS. The team reported that HIV-negative people did not show these genetic sequences in their bacteria."

So here they have found HIV infected bacteria, so another hypothesis is that the real cause of AIDS is really some other bacteria/fungii/mycoplasma which is simply infected with HIV thus producing antibodies in the person all the time the HIV is receiving the blame.  

As Duesberg points out after over 25 years of research with limitless funding they still have no answers which bears the hallmark of a flawed hypothesis. And of course every vaccine failure is always used to generate yet more funding..

Books I recommend:

Wild Fermentation (Author been HIV+ since 80's used fermented foods to heal himself) 

Ten Lies About Aids 

The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory 

Good luck!