I agree with this post. Anybody testing positive for HIV should at least take proper precautions. This doesn't mean that you have to go mainstream. There are effective alternative measures. For example, Sutherlandia OPC is 100% effective in reversing HIV/Aids symptoms. And if it should be a false positive? Well, many healthy people take it solely to strengthen their immune system and prevent many unwanted health conditions.
Herbal Supplement for HIV/AIDS is Successful in Clinical Trial
Success Against Cancer and HIV in South Africa
Two Oleander HIV Success Stories from Africa
The point is, it is better to err on the side of caution.
My Best,
Luella
Required reading: Henry Bauer sums it up nicely in a recent article.
http://www.scientificexploration.org/edgescience/edgescience_03.pdf
I think this article(and it's ensuing comments) will make interesting reading about my statement that HIV drugs can make a person well for non-virological reasons.
http://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-lazarus-effect-in-hivaids/
At the end of the day there is sooooooooo much that simply does not make sense with the HIV=AIDS science - having said that I do not dispute the high correlation of testing positive and then developing immune issues it is just an enigma that nobody has been able to conclusively prove HIV is the culprit for the CD4 destruction.
Here are some alternative hypothesises for you
http://drbroxmeyer.netfirms.com/001%20REV%20PDF%20IN%20PRESS%20AIDS%20%20ITS%...
And from the same authors:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/hiv_tuberculosis.pdf
Quote:
"In a startling new report, a team of Slovakian researchers headed by Vladimir Zajac has found genetic sequences of HIV ( the human immunodeficiency virus) in various bowel bacteria cultured from AIDS patients. It is well-known that HIV attacks blood cells of the immune system, but this is the first study indicating HIV can also infect bacteria naturally contained within the body. This novel finding gives rise to further questions concerning the transmissibility of HIV and the role that HIV-infected bacteria play in the transformation of HIV infection to full-blown clinical AIDS. The team reported that HIV-negative people did not show these genetic sequences in their bacteria." So here they have found HIV infected bacteria, so another hypothesis is that the real cause of AIDS is really some other bacteria/fungii/mycoplasma which is simply infected with HIV thus producing antibodies in the person all the time the HIV is receiving the blame.
As Duesberg points out after over 25 years of research with limitless funding they still have no answers which bears the hallmark of a flawed hypothesis. And of course every vaccine failure is always used to generate yet more funding..
Books I recommend:
Wild Fermentation (Author been HIV+ since 80's used fermented foods to heal himself)
The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory
Good luck!
I AM ABSOLUTELY RAGING MAD I HAVE JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT THE FOLLOWING RESEARCH WHICH DOCUMENTS AN HIV CURE IN THE Medical Journal of Virology BY USING SOMETHING CALLED GcMAF.
Here is an overview:
http://www.thenhf.com/articles/articles_919/articles_919.htm
And here is the actual study:
THIS IS THE REAL DEAL PEOPLE A TRUE CURE IF ANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN PALMED OFF WITH TOXIC DAMAGING MEDS NOW IS THE TIME TO GO APE!!!
Showbiz grab your doctor by the nuts and demand he reads the study then demand what he is going to do to get you some of this chemical!!!