Re: Rare Side Effect Is Seen in Long-Term Use of a Breast Cancer Drug
Good Morning Hv,
Okay so what are the chances for the need for this drug, or one like it if unopposed estrogen gets to run around unopposed from lack of restraint due to adrenal dysfunction?
What if breast is used for rightful purpose with four babies, and family members have not had mastectomies, and add the lack of interference from birth control pills? On the other hand smoking, past drinking/drugging and fate factored in I am as subject to this as anyone, and once faced the horror of finding OMG "A LUMP" only to hear the diagnosis "bone spur on rib" too many long days later, and then "a LUMP" again OMG a few years later proved to be "normal breast tissue" cyclic and tender prior to every menstruation - not even worthy of a mamogram?!
I'm curious what my chances are because a tubal ligation (tubes removed-not tied, not cauterized) 21 years ago is about as radically gynecologically invasive as I have experienced or want to - and from this experience I learned just how much the body WILL TRY TO CORRECT ITSELF!!! Poor little egg trying desperately to GET THROUGH the newly created BARRIER of scar tissue every month, and of course I AM A SENSITIVE and can feel EVERY bit of this!!!
If Tamoxifen is what American Medicos and BIG PHARMA has for TREATMENT, as in SOLUTION for women with breast cancer, then I am so ashamed to be American and live in this country at this time. I am evermore convinced they are indeed trying to take us out, one breast at a time!
Again, I will never agree to their methods - would rather perish than succumb to the lie. I want to forward this information to EVERY WOMAN. UNfortunately too many see only GOD in their M.D.'s eyes, and have INSURANCE B.S. leaving them only one path and little recourse - I have none and WANT none.
How did things get to be so wrong here?
Rhetorically,
seek2clean