To maintain that "Coral Calcium is NOT effective against cancer,"
in spite of so many personal testimonies, and scientific reasons why it should be helpful, would require (1) proving that cancer thrives EQUALLY in both acid and alkaline environments, (2) proving that an acid environment holds JUST AS MUCH OXYGEN as an alkaline one, (3) proving that Dr. Otto Warburg was wrong in maintaining that cancer is ANAEROBIC (can't grow in a high oxygen environment), for which he won a Nobel Prize, and (4) proving that coral calcium does not have a highly alkaline pH that can raise an oxygen deficient acid system up to an oxygen rich alkaline one. Prove these four points and you might have a decent argument. Ignore them and you do a great disservice to yourself and to your readers.