Re: frequencies?

Ahhhh!!! To agree but to disagree.

>- "Any positively offset frequency kills all bacteria, viruses and parasites simultaneously ..."

True and false. Under microscopic observation, it can be seen that at any given frequency some microbes are killed immediately while others continue unaffected for a while but eventually all die. Additionally, changing the frequency slightly changes the order of destruction ...

Frequency matters !!! At least for any specific organism.

It has been proven that bacteria can be killed by as little as 1.5 volts over a long period of time.

>- “Subsequent testing showed it was not due to some unique design, or special wave form produced by the device. It was due to battery operation!”

Again, as above and more. The same thing occurs when using a bimetalic thermocouple or when supplied from the power grid through a proper well regulated power supply.

>- “anything from 10Hz to 500,000Hz” will do.
So, who cares about frequency?!

As you do, I do, because as stated before, frequency makes a difference. As evidence of this, Rife works better and faster than Clark. Unfortunately, a good accurate frequency generator is expensive and you need to know what frequency is to be applied.

>- Why expend $60 or $100 or $250 on a zapper when you can buy a good one for less?

Simple, well designed zappers can produce much better results. They also can do things like surviving being dropped off of a second or third story balcony and still work. Better quality components.

The truth is, I would not go to the trouble and effort of manufacturing the ParaZapper CCa if it did not produce statistically better results. I would not take the time and effort to make the MX if it did not produce statistically better results for certain applications. While there is a definite price difference between zappers, it is not "all about the money".

I have seen some single frequency zappers that sell for more than ParaZapper CCa and apparantly those "original" zappers are selling a lot. Many are hand built junk using original outdated components.

>- Many newcomers to this field want to have “the best frequency”, where there is no one definitively better that any other

Again, this is misunderstood. A difference of only 1 Hz can make a difference for some parasites such as Ascaris, while for some bacteria, the broad range will have an effect as suggested.

Zappers are inherrently inaccurate, many having a tolerance of +/- 12 percent or more. ParaZappper has much tighter tolerances using Hi-Reliability 1 percent resistors. Even at that, At the specified 30 kHz in a standard zapper can be anywhere 26400 to 33600 Hz which is fine for many microbes but the exact frequency matters for certain organisms such as Ascaris, flukes, amoeba, etc. ParaZapper spec's are much tighter but still suffers from the same considerations.

To get around this, using dual frequencies doubles the chance of hitting a particular microbes frequency, using 3 frequencies increases this by another 50 percent. This is why ParaZapper MX was so successful for two reasons. First, being microprocessor based, the frequencies were far more exact and reproducible and second, there were 8 frequencies in each range (8 near 2500 Hz and 8 near 30 kHz). These frequencies were specially selected.

While that MX is not available any longer, we are about to introduce a new model that will exceed it.