Traderdrew once again shows a lack of understanding of the scientific process by elevating Intelligent Design and creationism to the level of theory. This is scientific mumbo jumbo and is an attempt to elevate its status in the minds of the public. There is no such elevation in the scientific minds. Religion and science are two different aspects of the human experience. They do not rely on the same principles to experience the world.
I can see how you get that impression because I sort of linearly structured all of the theories that attempt to explain the creative processes into one example.
Science is one thing but, do you think that science can explain everything? If you do then, how would you use the scientific process to test this next statement? How would you prove or disprove it with the scientific method?
"Science explains everything. If science cannot explain it, then it must not exist or it never existed."