Observer, DQ was right,you have been too quick to judge for you have done it once again.
Is there not two sides to every question?
If one is accused of say quackery, should then the accused defend him/herself with proof of their remedy to heal someone rather than to exchange personal remarks to the accuser? Leaving the readers to decide for themselves?
If the accuser then does not agree should he/she not explain the reason why he/she does not agree.
So instead of the readers listening to insults we listen to debate about the subject in hand and in that way we all learn.