Re: You've been doing your homework T!

At present, I registered as a member(no cost). There will be free newsletters forthcoming. I need to work on understanding the terminology.

I don't have a mortgage or have credit card debt or owe taxes to the IRS. There are 'products' that he has for people with these kinds of issues.
So far what I have read from the two available issues is most of the information pertains to those that want to get there money back from the IRS and create a zero balance.

Anyways I am into understanding what i can about this stuff.

Mostly what I am looking for is a way to deal with judges, police, judges and court, car titles, driver's license registration and also the banks and the their supposed requirement(?) to have customers fill out a IRS W-9/ssn. Which sets up a possible lien to be put on your account.

I do have a moment in court coming up (traffic citation), but not really confident at this time in going up against a judge, to try to get the thing dismissed. So, I will probably hold off until it feels more right.

The author of this site is into using scripture to support the point(s) that he is making, which is not a problem for me. There is an interesting bit with regard to understanding the use of PRESUMPTION in the courts from one of the above mentioned newsletters that I found interesting. It goes like this:

"In 1 Corinthians 2:14, God has distinguished that not every-one is the same. The natural man is not the
same as the child of God. So don't believe that we are all the same, that we're all human beings. The phrase, "We're only human" is very popular, but that's promoted to convince everybody that everyone is the same. They're always looking for sameness. That's what the law of identification is, it has to do with sameness. That's why they're always looking for your name, and address, etc. If you have all those things, you are like everyone else, you're a human being, a natural person, and you're subject to their jurisdiction.
He wants to see if you'll give recognition to all of the fictions out there; the name of a street, city, county, etc. that they create.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution says "all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." That's what they're looking for because those are their own creation. A name is something given by those in authority to those in subjection to that authority. So, when the natural man creates something, such as a 14th amendment citizen, he has a particular definition of that, and if you fit that definition, you are one of his because you are one of his creations.

Minimum contacts establish jurisdiction too, and what we have to do is shed all these things, and when they come to you with their presumptions, we have to rebut their presumptions. The attitude these bureaucrats take is "Well, we're just doing our job." But at some point they're going to have to recognize the truth. What you're doing, are you doing it for truth or are you doing it for another purpose? Because you get paid for it? If you're doing it just because you get paid for it, you're a heathen because you're doing it for the purposes of mammon, of money. And remember, ignorance of the law is no excuse:

"It is stated frequently that everyone is conclusively presumed to know the law." Holland v. Atlantic Stevendoor & Co. 210 Aff'd. 129, 205 NYS 397.
http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/Presumption.pdf

Be sure to check out the pdf on Presumption. Good stuff to know about.

What I sense is coming, when the whole system goes cashless (rfid cards), there may just come a time when a percentage of your electronic income will be simply taken out of your account automatically and go to the fed. I would like to find out if I can prevent that from happening. Looks like, from what I've read so far, it can only be done by filing the forms that are talked about in the available newsletters (1099OID, 1096 1099A) after the money is already "paid(?)". There may just be no other way to avoid this than to prepay and get it back later (supposedly) and/or move more into barter as that scenario unfolds.

I've written an email to Thomas Anderson (Australian) with regards to obtaining his book. From the "Strawman" audio/video, it seems that he mostly deals with collection agencies, mortgage forclosures and police and judges (tickets and citations) through writing letters using proof of claim inquiry. Something I would like to understand more about.

Will keep posting stuff as I come across it.

regards,
turiya




Tweet