CureZone   Log On   Join
Perhaps the most feasible solution but not a good one - imo anyway
 
Dquixote1217 Views: 6,665
Published: 16 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,388,044

Perhaps the most feasible solution but not a good one - imo anyway


I hate the damn spam filters and spam cops - in my experience they don't keep all the spam out and they send too many good messages to the spam/trash folders (or don't deliver them at all).  Messages from my Yahoo groups are often ID's as spam and so are messages when I send ebooks that have been ordered.

The problems I see with directing messages to our CZ inboxes are:

  • We are unable to determine what is a private message and what is a forum reply without looking at the messages individually - and some private messages might easily get lost in the shuffle.
  • Hard as some of us may find it to believe, many people may not live on CZ 24/7.  Those sporadic members may want to know about private messages and forum post replies in a timely way without being forced to check in daily.  As it is, they may not see such messages for days.

It may be the best, or at least most feasible, solution, but I would have to call it a "beats nothing" solution which is not one I would prefer if I had my druthers.  The best solution would be if there were someway for members to add Curezone.com to their approved lists on their private emails.  Unless it is causing problems for the website itself, I would suggest putting up notices to do just that and devising a way and instructions for all new members to do that in the future.

Thanks nevertheless.  It surely does beat nothing and I appreciate your efforts.

 

Share


 

Alert Moderators: Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  curezone.org

0.328 sec, (2)