Re: How To Legally Avoid Unwanted Immunizations Of All Kinds

Just to be clear on this, I'm not arguing the points (1 & 2) ... .okay, well, maybe technically I am.... if using real life case history as examples qualifies as a form of argument. I seem to recall that back in the early part of the year there was pretty big MSM news coverage made out of the small town in Maryland that is itself within the broad realm of metro D.C., and this little town, with it's little school, and it's little community of mothers, fathers, and children, were quite specifically held up to the nation to view, to watch, as they were very clearly made out to be an example of how, in practical everyday reality, there ARE circumstances when an entity has the power in this country to immunize the people's children agains tthe will and conviction of the parents. Bear with me here. I did not witness this first hand nor even second hand. I do not personally know any of the people (parents and children) alleged to have been caught up in this vortex of mass desctructive power being wielded. I read about it on-line. Parts of what I read on line referred to the portions of this event that were televised. I did not see the televised version, but even if I had, I personally do not accept televised information as always constituting air tight conclusive proof that something/anything happened the way the tv said. As such, I only have heresay to go on. Can anyone confirm? Did this event really really happen outside the realm of the media portraying this to have happened generally in accordance with how the advertised it? If it did, this would seem to confirm to the contray points 1 & 2. Plus or minus that there is also the situation of executive order madated at that state level (State of Texas), that for now may have been thwarted for a while, but likely only delayed for the time being, not terminated in full.

As to the fundamentals of those points 1 & 2, I agree wholeheartedly that, in theory, nobody has the authority to possess the power to do what those 2 points say. It goes without saying but I am going to say it nonetheless. We happen to be living during an era where there is a renewal of times past that has come to prevail again........ like we are into a new dark ages, that kind of renewal.....where every day the theories of post dark ages traditions of honest people seeking & serving true justice are crashing head first into practical every day realites of modern "law" whereupon governing people are very much about acting with the kind of power, by fiat, to do things that by traditions of law & justice, they do not have the authority, on paper,  theoreticaly, to do; yet they do. At this point, who's to stop them? They were not supposed tobe authorized to amass to themselves the kinds and quantities of power that they now have; yet they have it. Who's to stop them? These governing people are wielding powers that they are expressly not authorized to have. They are greatly aided by also owning various alternative forms that human wrought power manifests, right in their back pockets they own them, and some of these forms, on paper, theoretically, like Sherrifs, police and judges, and even down to the common citizens on the street invested with the power of Citizen's Arrest, are for all practical purposes in the back pockets of the governing people. Who then is to come to the aid of people who are being assaulted unwarranted by governing people run amok with the power they have amassed to themselves? Who is to protect  the people from their (on paper) protectors? The reality, every day, is that they do have this kind of mass destructive power and they are availing themselves to use it more often. Sad story that, but true. As far as this goes, who can blame them? There seems to be nobody willing nor capable of stopping them, so what incentive is there for them to not use the power amassed to themselves?  It greatly helps they have other kinds of raw power to call in to assist them as they see fit ... guns... and ammo.... and tasers..... and "crowd control" weapons..... and spy satellites and networks of networks of other human and or tech recources - even global, to brign to bear as necessary..... .and prisons, they have lots of prisons, ....and lots of bully boys walking the streets and cruising the highways acting in their stead, bully boys and girls who mistakenly believe they are providing genuine service to the community...... and the tv people , they own the tv people... comes in handy when the power is to be used to beam, and display and choreograph before the powerless masses that all of this unwaranted use upon them of massively destructive abusive power in action is being used as though it is "good". "good" in this context is loosley defined by the question - red pill or blue pill? - assumed figuratively to be answered by the latter.