So, let's devise a test...

...Let's take ourselves off MSG, etc., and see what happens.

If we were monitored by our own doctors, then the evidence would be more than 'anecdotal', wouldn't it?

Anyone who can develop or has developed their own detection system, or who is cared for by someone who has, may participate. We wouldn't necessarily have to have symptoms of illness.

And, since we use 'handles' (screen names and numbers), we can remain anonymous.

Even our doctors wouldn't need to be named or exposed to criticism in any way. They wouldn't be doing any lab tests, etc., any differently than usual. And we believe each other, according to our own judgement of what is posted. It's not as though we would be asking participants to TAKE anything.

Several other points could be proven, as well.

We could all learn to 'muscle test', in some way, with certainty.

Depending on the efficiency of our reporting form, we might even develop standards of measuring and maintaining health for all the people of the world.

As individuals, we could name ONLY the brands we find to be FREE of toxins, allowing us to judge our results against those of other participants. This could be done on a separate, and permanent, list...the point being to support all the companies and growers who produce superior products.

(I'm really fond of accentuating the positive!)

So, what do you think? Could we do it? There are some powerful researchers on these boards. I wonder what they think.

fledgling
Tweet