Re: We've already got real iodine.

I've made Lugol's Iodine for over 20 years.


"It kills anything it touches in it's pure form and is superior to chemo therapy, etc"

I have touched it in pure form many times, and assure you that it did not kill me. You may wish to consider the use of words of more precision.


"I took it for 10+ years and never experinced an increase in health;"

Why on earth would anyone take anything for 10+ years , if they never experienced an increase in health ?

See, if there is no increase, then the only other possibilities is that it had a neutral effect, or caused a decrease in health.

Certainly, no reasonable person would volunatrialy take something 10+ years if it caused a decrease in health, and if it had no effect, I'd expect they'd stop ater a short while.


You can suggest all you want about trees and berries having Iodine in them, but until it's proven by titration, it's all conjecture.

Besides, Iodine has been known for about 200 years. During this time, all of its sources have likely been discovered. We know where the iodine is.

As much as some may like to profit from discovering new sources of natural iodine, that's not going to happen.

Just because something is purple doesn't mean it contains iodine - that's a flawed assumption. It's no more true than cherry juice contains blood, because it's red.